Asymmetric risk spillover between financial market uncertainty and the carbon market: A GAS-DCS-copula approach

被引:79
作者
Yuan, Nannan [1 ]
Yang, Lu [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhongnan Univ Econ & Law, Sch Finance, 182 Nanhu Ave, Wuhan 430073, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Univ, Coll Econ, 3688 Nanhai Ave, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon market; Uncertainty; GAS-DCS-Copula; Risk spillover; OIL MARKET; EU ETS; ENERGY MARKETS; SYSTEMIC RISK; FAT TAILS; CRUDE-OIL; VOLATILITY; PRICE; INFORMATION; COVAR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120750
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A thorough understanding the asymmetry in risk-transferring mechanisms remains a challenge in the carbon market. Through the incorporation of the asymmetric tail distribution into the risk-transferring mechanism, the asymmetric response of the carbon market to financial market uncertainties can be explored. Herein, we propose a generalized autoregressive score-dynamic conditional score-Copula model to investigate the asymmetric risk spillover between financial market uncertainty and the carbon market. We discover the existence of considerable asymmetric risk spillover from financial market uncertainty to the carbon market. Specifically, the upper tail risk spillover effect is greater than the lower tail risk spillover effect. The degree of risk spillover reached a peak during the European debt crisis. Also, higher degrees of financial market uncertainty, and especially uncertainty from the crude oil market, cause a greater risk spillover to the carbon market than lower degrees of financial market uncertainty do. In addition, we discover that stock market uncertainty exhibits greater power than crude oil market uncertainty in transferring risk to the carbon market when systemic events occur. Our research provides meaningful information to investors and policy makers. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Price determination in the EU ETS market: Theory and econometric analysis with market fundamentals [J].
Aatola, Piia ;
Ollikainen, Markku ;
Toppinen, Anne .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 :380-395
[2]   Bootstrap tests for distributional treatment effects in instrumental variable models [J].
Abadie, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 97 (457) :284-292
[3]   CoVaR [J].
Adrian, Tobias ;
Brunnermeier, Markus K. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (07) :1705-1741
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Journal of Financial Econometrics
[5]   Risk spillovers across the energy and carbon markets and hedging strategies for carbon risk [J].
Balcilar, Mehmet ;
Demirer, Riza ;
Hammoudeh, Shawkat ;
Duc Khuong Nguyen .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2016, 54 :159-172
[6]   Risk, uncertainty, and asset prices [J].
Bekaert, Geert ;
Engstrom, Eric ;
Xing, Yuhang .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 91 (01) :59-82
[7]   Emission abatement: Untangling the impacts of the EU ETS and the economic crisis [J].
Bel, Germa ;
Joseph, Stephan .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2015, 49 :531-539
[8]   The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks [J].
Bloom, Nicholas .
ECONOMETRICA, 2009, 77 (03) :623-685
[9]   Detecting instability in the volatility of carbon prices [J].
Chevallier, Julien .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (01) :99-110
[10]   GENERALIZED AUTOREGRESSIVE SCORE MODELS WITH APPLICATIONS [J].
Creal, Drew ;
Koopman, Siem Jan ;
Lucas, Andre .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2013, 28 (05) :777-795