Oral micronized progesterone combined with vaginal progesterone gel for luteal support

被引:10
|
作者
Tomic, Vlatka [1 ]
Tomic, Jozo [1 ]
Klaic, Djurdja Zigmundovac [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ctr Sisters Mercy, Dept Human Reprod, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
[2] Dom Zdravlja Zagreb Ctr, Zagreb, Croatia
关键词
IVF/ET; luteal phase support; progesterone; pregnancy rate; tolerability; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; PHASE SUPPORT; INTRAMUSCULAR PROGESTERONE; CRINONE; 8-PERCENT; SUPPLEMENTATION; GONADOTROPIN; METAANALYSIS; ABSORPTION; WOMEN; IVF;
D O I
10.3109/09513590.2011.569791
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and satisfaction rate of combined therapy of oral micronized progesterone capsules and vaginal progesterone gel versus monotherapy with vaginal progesterone gel in luteal support. A case-control study was performed on a total number of 370 women aged <45 years undergoing IVF-ET treatment. The patients received either combination of Crinone 8% vaginal gel, 90 mg daily dose and Utrogestan oral capsules 3 x 100 mg, or Crinone 8% vaginal gel, 90 mg daily. Progesterone supplementation begun on the day of oocyte retrieval and continued until pregnancy was tested and in the case of pregnancy until week 8. The comparable rates of ongoing pregnancies were noted with use of combined-progesterone therapy (39.5%) and progesterone-monotherapy (33.5%). Abortion rate (6.4% vs. 15.6%) was significantly lower with the use of combined therapy. Tolerability and satisfaction of both supplements was almost equal but bleeding occurred more frequently in the progesterone-monotherapy group. In conclusion, the efficacy, satisfaction and tolerability of combined and vaginal progesterone supplements were comparable, but bleeding in early pregnancy and abortion rate presented more frequently with the use of vaginal progesterone.
引用
收藏
页码:1010 / 1013
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Phase III randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral dydrogesterone versus micronized vaginal progesterone for luteal support in in vitro fertilization
    Tournaye, Herman
    Sukhikh, Gennady T.
    Kahler, Elke
    Griesinger, Georg
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2017, 32 (05) : 1019 - 1027
  • [42] Vaginal Progesterone Gel versus Intramuscular Progesterone for Luteal Phase Support in Suboptimal Responders Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Cycles
    Ulubasoglu, Hasan
    Bakay, Kadir
    Yavuzcan, Ali
    Gueven, Davut
    Hatirnaz, Safak
    Dahan, Michael H.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 51 (09)
  • [43] Intramuscular progesterone versus 8% Crinone vaginal gel for luteal phase support for day 3 cryopreserved embryo transfer
    Kaser, Daniel J.
    Ginsburg, Elizabeth S.
    Missmer, Stacey A.
    Correia, Katharine F.
    Racowsky, Catherine
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2012, 98 (06) : 1464 - 1469
  • [44] A meta-analysis of the route of administration of luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology: vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone
    Zarutskie, Paul W.
    Phillips, James A.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 92 (01) : 163 - 169
  • [45] Efficacy of luteal phase support with vaginal progesterone in intrauterine insemination: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Miralpeix, Ester
    Gonzalez-Comadran, Mireia
    Sola, Ivan
    Manau, Dolors
    Carreras, Ramon
    Checa, Miguel A.
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2014, 31 (01) : 89 - 100
  • [46] A comparative study of dydrogesterone and micronized progesterone for luteal phase support during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles
    Saharkhiz, Nasrin
    Zamaniyan, Marzieh
    Salehpour, Saghar
    Zadehmodarres, Shahrzad
    Hoseini, Sedighe
    Cheraghi, Leila
    Seif, Samira
    Baheiraei, Nafiseh
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 (03) : 213 - 217
  • [47] Efficacy and tolerability of vaginal progesterone capsules (Utrogest™ 200) compared with progesterone gel (Crinone™ 8%) for luteal phase support during assisted reproduction
    Kleinstein, J
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (06) : 1641 - 1649
  • [48] Systematic review of the clinical efficacy of vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology cycles
    Child, Tim
    Leonard, Saoirse A.
    Evans, Jennifer S.
    Lass, Amir
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2018, 36 (06) : 630 - 645
  • [49] Oral micronized progesterone
    de Lignières, B
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1999, 21 (01) : 41 - 60
  • [50] The progesterone vaginal ring as a luteal phase support in in vitro fertilization
    Vargas-Tominaga, Luis
    Medina, Andrea
    Vargas, Andrea
    Gomez, Maritza
    Huillca, Flor
    Vargas, Patricia
    REVISTA PERUANA DE GINECOLOGIA Y OBSTETRICIA, 2022, 68 (04):