Round-Robin test of split Hopkinson pressure bar

被引:30
|
作者
Kariem, Muhammad A. [1 ,5 ]
Santiago, Rafael C. [2 ,6 ]
Govender, Reuben [3 ]
Shu, Dong Wei [4 ]
Ruan, Dong [5 ]
Nurick, Gerald [3 ]
Alves, Marcilio [6 ]
Lu, Guoxing [5 ]
Langdon, Genevieve S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Teknol Bandung, Fac Mech & Aerosp Engn, Ganesha St 10, Bandung 40132, West Java, Indonesia
[2] Fed Univ ABC UFABC, Ctr Engn Modelling & Appl Social Sci CECS, Ave Estados 5001, BR-09210580 Santo Andre, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Cape Town, Dept Mech Engn, BISRU, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
[4] Nanyang Technol Univ, Sch Mech & Aerosp Engn, 50 Nanyang Ave, Singapore 639798, Singapore
[5] Swinburne Univ Technol, Fac Sci Engn & Technol, POB 218, Hawthorn, Vic 3122, Australia
[6] Univ Sao Paulo, Grp Solid Mech & Struct Impact, Dept Mech & Mech Syst Engn, BR-03178200 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
Round-Robin test; Split Hopkinson pressure bar (Kolsky); High strain rate compression; Dynamic characterization; Standardization; FRICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.12.003
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
A Round-Robin test using split Hopkinson pressure bars (SHPBs) has been conducted by four universities: Swinburne University of Technology (SUT), Australia; University of Sao Paulo (USP), Brazil; University of Cape Town (UCT), South Africa; and Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. Each university had different sets of SHPBs and data acquisition systems. The bars were made of maraging 350 (SUT), SAE 1055 (USP), stainless steel 17-4 pH (UCT), and stainless steel 304 (NTU), respectively. The bar diameters were in a range of 12.7 to 24.99 mm and the lengths of the pressure bars were from 700 mm to 2000 mm. Compressive SHPB tests have been conducted on four metals: commercially pure copper, stainless steel grade 316 (SS316), aluminium alloy 1100 and magnesium alloy. The strain signals and stress-strain curves for each material measured by four universities have been compared and discussed. The results showed that the flow stress fluctuated in a range of +/- 9.9% for copper, +/- 3.3% for SS316, +/- 6.7% for aluminium and +/- 15.6% for magnesium. Specific strain rate or final true strains were not targeted in this study. Hence the strain rates ranged from 987 to 2690 s(-1), and final true strains varied from 0.12 to 0.38. This international collaboration attempts to provide evidence for the possible standardization of SHPB tests in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 75
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mini Round-Robin Test on the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar
    Kariem, M. A.
    Ruan, D.
    Beynon, J. H.
    Prabowo, D. A.
    JOURNAL OF TESTING AND EVALUATION, 2018, 46 (02) : 457 - 468
  • [2] Numerical Study of Round-Robin Tests on the Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar Technique
    Kariem, Muhammad A.
    Ruan, Dong
    Beynon, John H.
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING PLASTICITY XI, 2013, 535-536 : 518 - 521
  • [3] Split Hopkinson pressure bar test on limestone
    Li, Sheng-Lin
    Liu, Dian-Shu
    Zhang, Hui
    Jiang, Ya-Qin
    Xiao, Liao
    Beijing Ligong Daxue Xuebao/Transaction of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2013, 33 (12): : 1224 - 1228
  • [4] ROUND-ROBIN TEST TO REVISE PRESSURE RATING STANDARD
    不详
    HYDRAULICS & PNEUMATICS, 1979, 32 (07) : 82 - &
  • [5] Stress equilibrium in the split Hopkinson pressure bar test
    Wu, X.J.
    Gorham, D.A.
    Journal De Physique. IV : JP, 1997, 7 (03): : 91 - 96
  • [6] Stress equilibrium in the split Hopkinson pressure bar test
    Wu, XJ
    Gorham, DA
    JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE IV, 1997, 7 (C3): : 91 - 96
  • [7] ROUND-ROBIN TEST PARTICIPANTS SOUGHT
    LABREQUE, JJ
    ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1979, 51 (09) : A922 - A922
  • [8] Approach to minish scattering of results for split Hopkinson pressure bar test
    Li Xi-bing
    Zhou Zi-long
    Zhao Yang-sheng
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 14 (03): : 404 - 407
  • [9] Dynamic Brazilian test of concrete using split Hopkinson pressure bar
    Xudong Chen
    Limei Ge
    Jikai Zhou
    Shengxing Wu
    Materials and Structures, 2017, 50
  • [10] Approach to minish scattering of results for split Hopkinson pressure bar test
    李夕兵
    周子龙
    赵阳升
    Journal of Central South University of Technology, 2007, (03) : 404 - 407