Fast ejecta during the ascending phase of solar cycle 23: ACE observations, 1998-1999

被引:150
作者
Burlaga, LF [1 ]
Skoug, RM
Smith, CW
Webb, DF
Zurbuchen, TH
Reinard, A
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Extraterr Phys Lab, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Bartol Res Inst, Newark, DE 19711 USA
[4] Boston Coll, Inst Sci Res, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Atmospher Ocean & Space Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2000JA000214
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We discuss fast ejecta observed at 1 AU during a period of increasing solar activity from February 5, 1998, to November 29, 1999. "Fast ejecta" are transient, noncorotating flows that move past the Earth during a day or more, with a maximum speed > 600 km s(-1). We identify two classes of fast ejecta at 1 AU: (1) magnetic clouds, whose local magnetic structure is that of a flux rope; and (2) "complex ejecta," which are not flux ropes and have disordered magnetic fields. Nearly equal numbers of magnetic clouds and complex ejecta were found: four and five, respectively. The complex ejecta had weaker magnetic fields and higher proton temperatures than the magnetic clouds on average. The average beta for the complex ejecta (0.25 +/- 0.09) was larger than that for the magnetic clouds (0.06 +/- 0.04). The complex ejecta and magnetic clouds had comparable speeds on average, namely, 558 +/- 80 and 500 +/- 63 km s(-1), respectively. Using the duration of the stream and that of the counterstreaming electrons to measure the ejecta, the average time for the complex ejecta to move past ACE was 3 days, which is more than twice that for the magnetic clouds. All of the magnetic clouds contain some material with a high alpha /proton density ratio (>8%) and a density ratio of O7+/O6+ > 1. However, three of the five complex ejecta did not contain material with O7+/O6+ > 1, although four of the complex ejecta contained material with O7+/O6+ > 1. All of the magnetic clouds caused geomagnetic storms. Three complex ejecta produced no geomagnetic storms. The other two complex ejecta produced geomagnetic storms indirectly: one by driving a shock into the rear of a magnetic cloud and the other by amplifying southward fields in its leading edge and interaction region. Most of the magnetic clouds were associated with a single solar source, but nearly all of the complex ejecta could have had multiple sources. We find evidence in the solar observations that some of the complex ejecta could have been produced by the interaction of two or more coronal mass ejections (CMEs). At least three CMEs might have interacted to produce a large complex ejection that arrived at 1 AU on May 4, 1998. This complex ejection was overtaking and interacting with a magnetic cloud. We discuss several hypotheses concerning the structures and origins of complex ejecta, including the likely possibility that some complex ejecta are formed by a series of interacting CMEs of various sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:20957 / 20977
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Absolute solar 30.4 nm flux from sounding rocket observations during the solar cycle 23 minimum
    Judge, DL
    McMullin, DR
    Ogawa, HS
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1999, 104 (A12) : 28321 - 28324
  • [42] Ulysses energetic ion observations during the declining phase of solar cycle 22
    Sanderson, T.R.
    Advances in Space Research, 16 (09):
  • [43] Organization of Energetic Particles by the Solar Wind Structure During the Declining to Minimum Phase of Solar Cycle 23
    Lee, C. O.
    Luhmann, J. G.
    de Pater, I.
    Mason, G. M.
    Haggerty, D.
    Richardson, I. G.
    Cane, H. V.
    Jian, L. K.
    Russell, C. T.
    Desai, M. I.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2010, 263 (1-2) : 239 - 261
  • [44] Organization of Energetic Particles by the Solar Wind Structure During the Declining to Minimum Phase of Solar Cycle 23
    C. O. Lee
    J. G. Luhmann
    I. de Pater
    G. M. Mason
    D. Haggerty
    I. G. Richardson
    H. V. Cane
    L. K. Jian
    C. T. Russell
    M. I. Desai
    Solar Physics, 2010, 263 : 239 - 261
  • [45] Correlation between some irradiance indices during the rising phase of the solar cycle 23
    Lorenc, M
    Dorotovic, I
    SOLAR VARIABILITY: FROM CORE TO OUTER FRONTIERS, VOLS 1 & 2, 2002, 506 : 165 - 167
  • [46] Preliminary study in the current sheet structure during the rising phase of the Solar Cycle 23
    Blanco, JJ
    Rodríguez-Pacheco, J
    Cid, C
    Hidalgo, MA
    Nieves-Chinchilla, T
    Bronchalo, E
    Sequeiros, J
    SOLSPA 2001: PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND SOLAR CYCLE AND SPACE WEATHER EUROCONFERENCE, 2002, 477 : 327 - 330
  • [47] Energetic proton observations at 1 and 5 AU 2. Rising phase of the solar cycle 23
    Lario, D
    Marsden, RG
    Sanderson, TR
    Maksimovic, M
    Sanahuja, B
    Plunkett, SP
    Balogh, A
    Forsyth, RJ
    Lin, RP
    Gosling, JT
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2000, 105 (A8) : 18251 - 18274
  • [48] Signatures of geoeffective space weather events in cosmic rays during the ascending phase of the solar cycle 24
    Gil, Agnieszka
    Berendt-Marchel, M.
    Modzelewska, R.
    Moskwa, Sz.
    Siluszyk, A.
    Siluszyk, M.
    Tomasik, L.
    Wawrzaszek, A.
    Wawrzynczak, A.
    37TH INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, ICRC2021, 2022,
  • [49] Modulation of pineal activity during the 23rd sunspot cycle: Melatonin rise during the ascending phase of the cycle is accompanied by an increase of the sympathetic tone
    Bartsch, Christian
    Bartsch, Hella
    Seebald, Eckhard
    Kuepper, Heinz
    Mecke, Dieter
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2014, 52 (05) : 438 - 447
  • [50] ULYSSES SOLAR-WIND PLASMA OBSERVATIONS DURING THE DECLINING PHASE OF SOLAR-CYCLE-22
    PHILLIPS, JL
    BAME, SJ
    FELDMAN, WC
    GOSLING, JT
    HAMMOND, CM
    MCCOMAS, DJ
    GOLDSTEIN, BE
    NEUGEBAUER, M
    HELIOSPHERE DURING THE DECLINING SOLAR CYCLE, 1995, 16 (09): : 85 - 94