Fast ejecta during the ascending phase of solar cycle 23: ACE observations, 1998-1999

被引:150
作者
Burlaga, LF [1 ]
Skoug, RM
Smith, CW
Webb, DF
Zurbuchen, TH
Reinard, A
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Extraterr Phys Lab, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Bartol Res Inst, Newark, DE 19711 USA
[4] Boston Coll, Inst Sci Res, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Atmospher Ocean & Space Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2000JA000214
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We discuss fast ejecta observed at 1 AU during a period of increasing solar activity from February 5, 1998, to November 29, 1999. "Fast ejecta" are transient, noncorotating flows that move past the Earth during a day or more, with a maximum speed > 600 km s(-1). We identify two classes of fast ejecta at 1 AU: (1) magnetic clouds, whose local magnetic structure is that of a flux rope; and (2) "complex ejecta," which are not flux ropes and have disordered magnetic fields. Nearly equal numbers of magnetic clouds and complex ejecta were found: four and five, respectively. The complex ejecta had weaker magnetic fields and higher proton temperatures than the magnetic clouds on average. The average beta for the complex ejecta (0.25 +/- 0.09) was larger than that for the magnetic clouds (0.06 +/- 0.04). The complex ejecta and magnetic clouds had comparable speeds on average, namely, 558 +/- 80 and 500 +/- 63 km s(-1), respectively. Using the duration of the stream and that of the counterstreaming electrons to measure the ejecta, the average time for the complex ejecta to move past ACE was 3 days, which is more than twice that for the magnetic clouds. All of the magnetic clouds contain some material with a high alpha /proton density ratio (>8%) and a density ratio of O7+/O6+ > 1. However, three of the five complex ejecta did not contain material with O7+/O6+ > 1, although four of the complex ejecta contained material with O7+/O6+ > 1. All of the magnetic clouds caused geomagnetic storms. Three complex ejecta produced no geomagnetic storms. The other two complex ejecta produced geomagnetic storms indirectly: one by driving a shock into the rear of a magnetic cloud and the other by amplifying southward fields in its leading edge and interaction region. Most of the magnetic clouds were associated with a single solar source, but nearly all of the complex ejecta could have had multiple sources. We find evidence in the solar observations that some of the complex ejecta could have been produced by the interaction of two or more coronal mass ejections (CMEs). At least three CMEs might have interacted to produce a large complex ejection that arrived at 1 AU on May 4, 1998. This complex ejection was overtaking and interacting with a magnetic cloud. We discuss several hypotheses concerning the structures and origins of complex ejecta, including the likely possibility that some complex ejecta are formed by a series of interacting CMEs of various sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:20957 / 20977
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Solar and Heliospheric Causes of Geomagnetic Perturbations during the Growth Phase of Solar Cycle 23
    V. Bothmer
    I. S. Veselovsky
    A. V. Dmitriev
    A. N. Zhukov
    P. Cargill
    E. P. Romashets
    O. S. Yakovchouk
    Solar System Research, 2002, 36 : 499 - 506
  • [32] CME velocities, accelerations, widths and positions in the ascending phase of the solar cycle 23 (1996-2001)
    Moussas, X
    Polygiannakis, JM
    Hillaris, A
    Preka-Papadema, P
    Andrikopoulou, E
    SOLMAG 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE MAGNETIC COUPLING OF THE SOLAR ATMOSPHERE EUROCONFERENCE AND IAU COLLOQUIUM 188, 2002, 505 : 513 - 516
  • [33] Solar and heliospheric causes of geomagnetic perturbations during the growth phase of solar cycle 23
    Bothmer, V
    Veselovsky, IS
    Dmitriev, AV
    Zhukov, AN
    Cargill, P
    Romashets, EP
    Yakovchouk, OS
    SOLAR SYSTEM RESEARCH, 2002, 36 (06) : 499 - 506
  • [34] Storm Responses of Radiation Belts During Solar Cycle 23: HEO Satellite Observations
    Fennell, J. F.
    Kanekal, S.
    Roeder, J. L.
    DYNAMICS OF THE EARTH'S RADIATION BELTS AND INNER MAGNETOSPHERE, 2012, 199 : 371 - +
  • [35] Exploring solar flares and solar radio bursts associated with β-γ-δ active regions during the ascending phase of the solar cycle 25
    Mohd Afandi, Nur Zulaikha
    Umar, Roslan
    Zafar, Sharifah Nurul Aisyah Syed
    Sabri, Nor Hazmin
    Monstein, Christian
    Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2024, 2915 (01):
  • [36] The Solar Wind at 1 AU During the Declining Phase of Solar Cycle 23: Comparison of 3D Numerical Model Results with Observations
    C. O. Lee
    J. G. Luhmann
    D. Odstrcil
    P. J. MacNeice
    I. de Pater
    P. Riley
    C. N. Arge
    Solar Physics, 2009, 254 : 155 - 183
  • [37] The Solar Wind at 1 AU During the Declining Phase of Solar Cycle 23: Comparison of 3D Numerical Model Results with Observations
    Lee, C. O.
    Luhmann, J. G.
    Odstrcil, D.
    MacNeice, P. J.
    de Pater, I.
    Riley, P.
    Arge, C. N.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2009, 254 (01) : 155 - 183
  • [38] Solar wind Alfvenicity during solar cycle 23 and 24 Perspective for future observations with Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter
    D'Amicis, R.
    Alielden, K.
    Perrone, D.
    Bruno, R.
    Telloni, D.
    Raines, J. M.
    Lepri, S. T.
    Zhao, L.
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2021, 654
  • [39] Evolution of coronal streamer structure during the rising phase of solar cycle 23
    Wang, YM
    Sheeley, NR
    Rich, NB
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2000, 27 (02) : 149 - 152
  • [40] Absolute solar 30.4 nm flux from sounding rocket observations during the solar cycle 23 minimum
    Judge, DL
    McMullin, DR
    Ogawa, HS
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1999, 104 (A12) : 28321 - 28324