Fast ejecta during the ascending phase of solar cycle 23: ACE observations, 1998-1999

被引:150
|
作者
Burlaga, LF [1 ]
Skoug, RM
Smith, CW
Webb, DF
Zurbuchen, TH
Reinard, A
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Extraterr Phys Lab, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Bartol Res Inst, Newark, DE 19711 USA
[4] Boston Coll, Inst Sci Res, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Atmospher Ocean & Space Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2000JA000214
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We discuss fast ejecta observed at 1 AU during a period of increasing solar activity from February 5, 1998, to November 29, 1999. "Fast ejecta" are transient, noncorotating flows that move past the Earth during a day or more, with a maximum speed > 600 km s(-1). We identify two classes of fast ejecta at 1 AU: (1) magnetic clouds, whose local magnetic structure is that of a flux rope; and (2) "complex ejecta," which are not flux ropes and have disordered magnetic fields. Nearly equal numbers of magnetic clouds and complex ejecta were found: four and five, respectively. The complex ejecta had weaker magnetic fields and higher proton temperatures than the magnetic clouds on average. The average beta for the complex ejecta (0.25 +/- 0.09) was larger than that for the magnetic clouds (0.06 +/- 0.04). The complex ejecta and magnetic clouds had comparable speeds on average, namely, 558 +/- 80 and 500 +/- 63 km s(-1), respectively. Using the duration of the stream and that of the counterstreaming electrons to measure the ejecta, the average time for the complex ejecta to move past ACE was 3 days, which is more than twice that for the magnetic clouds. All of the magnetic clouds contain some material with a high alpha /proton density ratio (>8%) and a density ratio of O7+/O6+ > 1. However, three of the five complex ejecta did not contain material with O7+/O6+ > 1, although four of the complex ejecta contained material with O7+/O6+ > 1. All of the magnetic clouds caused geomagnetic storms. Three complex ejecta produced no geomagnetic storms. The other two complex ejecta produced geomagnetic storms indirectly: one by driving a shock into the rear of a magnetic cloud and the other by amplifying southward fields in its leading edge and interaction region. Most of the magnetic clouds were associated with a single solar source, but nearly all of the complex ejecta could have had multiple sources. We find evidence in the solar observations that some of the complex ejecta could have been produced by the interaction of two or more coronal mass ejections (CMEs). At least three CMEs might have interacted to produce a large complex ejection that arrived at 1 AU on May 4, 1998. This complex ejection was overtaking and interacting with a magnetic cloud. We discuss several hypotheses concerning the structures and origins of complex ejecta, including the likely possibility that some complex ejecta are formed by a series of interacting CMEs of various sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:20957 / 20977
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EVOLUTION OF CORONAL HELMETS DURING ASCENDING PHASE OF SOLAR-CYCLE 20
    HANSEN, SF
    HANSEN, RT
    GARCIA, CJ
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 1972, 26 (01) : 202 - &
  • [22] Solar origins of solar wind properties during the cycle 23 solar minimum and rising phase of cycle 24
    Luhmann, Janet G.
    Petrie, Gordon
    Riley, Pete
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH, 2013, 4 (03) : 221 - 228
  • [23] Solar Activity Parameters and Associated Forbush Decreases During the Minimum Between Cycles 23 and 24 and the Ascending Phase of Cycle 24
    D. Lingri
    H. Mavromichalaki
    A. Belov
    E. Eroshenko
    V. Yanke
    A. Abunin
    M. Abunina
    Solar Physics, 2016, 291 : 1025 - 1041
  • [24] Solar Activity Parameters and Associated Forbush Decreases During the Minimum Between Cycles 23 and 24 and the Ascending Phase of Cycle 24
    Lingri, D.
    Mavromichalaki, H.
    Belov, A.
    Eroshenko, E.
    Yanke, V.
    Abunin, A.
    Abunina, M.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2016, 291 (03) : 1025 - 1041
  • [25] Voyager observations of low-energy ions during solar cycle 23
    Decker, RB
    Krimigis, SM
    HELIOSPHERE AT SOLAR MAXIMUM, 2003, 32 (04): : 597 - 602
  • [26] STEREO OBSERVATIONS OF THE ENERGETIC HEAVY IONS DURING THE MINIMUM OF SOLAR CYCLE 23
    Bucik, R.
    Mall, U.
    Korth, A.
    Mason, G. M.
    COSMIC RAYS FOR PARTICLE AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2011, 6 : 328 - +
  • [27] Study of Corotating Interaction Regions in the Ascending Phase of the Solar Cycle: Multi-spacecraft Observations
    Gonzalez-Esparza, J. A.
    Romero-Hernandez, E.
    Riley, P.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2013, 285 (1-2) : 201 - 216
  • [28] Study of Corotating Interaction Regions in the Ascending Phase of the Solar Cycle: Multi-spacecraft Observations
    J. A. Gonzalez-Esparza
    E. Romero-Hernandez
    P. Riley
    Solar Physics, 2013, 285 : 201 - 216
  • [29] New model fit functions of the plasmapause location determined using THEMIS observations during the ascending phase of Solar Cycle 24
    Cho, Junghee
    Lee, Dae-Young
    Kim, Jin-Hee
    Shin, Dae-Kyu
    Kim, Kyung-Chan
    Turner, Drew
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2015, 120 (04) : 2877 - 2889
  • [30] Overview of the flare index during the maximum phase of the solar cycle 23
    Ataç, T
    Özgüç, A
    Rybák, J
    INFLUENCE OF THE SUN'S RADIATION AND PARTICLES ON THE EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE AND CLIMATE, 2005, 35 (03): : 400 - 405