Fast ejecta during the ascending phase of solar cycle 23: ACE observations, 1998-1999

被引:150
|
作者
Burlaga, LF [1 ]
Skoug, RM
Smith, CW
Webb, DF
Zurbuchen, TH
Reinard, A
机构
[1] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Extraterr Phys Lab, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[3] Univ Delaware, Bartol Res Inst, Newark, DE 19711 USA
[4] Boston Coll, Inst Sci Res, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167 USA
[5] Univ Michigan, Dept Atmospher Ocean & Space Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2000JA000214
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We discuss fast ejecta observed at 1 AU during a period of increasing solar activity from February 5, 1998, to November 29, 1999. "Fast ejecta" are transient, noncorotating flows that move past the Earth during a day or more, with a maximum speed > 600 km s(-1). We identify two classes of fast ejecta at 1 AU: (1) magnetic clouds, whose local magnetic structure is that of a flux rope; and (2) "complex ejecta," which are not flux ropes and have disordered magnetic fields. Nearly equal numbers of magnetic clouds and complex ejecta were found: four and five, respectively. The complex ejecta had weaker magnetic fields and higher proton temperatures than the magnetic clouds on average. The average beta for the complex ejecta (0.25 +/- 0.09) was larger than that for the magnetic clouds (0.06 +/- 0.04). The complex ejecta and magnetic clouds had comparable speeds on average, namely, 558 +/- 80 and 500 +/- 63 km s(-1), respectively. Using the duration of the stream and that of the counterstreaming electrons to measure the ejecta, the average time for the complex ejecta to move past ACE was 3 days, which is more than twice that for the magnetic clouds. All of the magnetic clouds contain some material with a high alpha /proton density ratio (>8%) and a density ratio of O7+/O6+ > 1. However, three of the five complex ejecta did not contain material with O7+/O6+ > 1, although four of the complex ejecta contained material with O7+/O6+ > 1. All of the magnetic clouds caused geomagnetic storms. Three complex ejecta produced no geomagnetic storms. The other two complex ejecta produced geomagnetic storms indirectly: one by driving a shock into the rear of a magnetic cloud and the other by amplifying southward fields in its leading edge and interaction region. Most of the magnetic clouds were associated with a single solar source, but nearly all of the complex ejecta could have had multiple sources. We find evidence in the solar observations that some of the complex ejecta could have been produced by the interaction of two or more coronal mass ejections (CMEs). At least three CMEs might have interacted to produce a large complex ejection that arrived at 1 AU on May 4, 1998. This complex ejection was overtaking and interacting with a magnetic cloud. We discuss several hypotheses concerning the structures and origins of complex ejecta, including the likely possibility that some complex ejecta are formed by a series of interacting CMEs of various sizes.
引用
收藏
页码:20957 / 20977
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Solar diameter observations at Observatorio Nacional in 1998-1999
    Puliaev, S
    Penna, JL
    Jilinski, EG
    Andrei, AH
    ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 2000, 143 (02): : 265 - 267
  • [2] Global distribution of the solar wind during solar cycle 23: ACE observations
    Zhao, L.
    Zurbuchen, T. H.
    Fisk, L. A.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2009, 36
  • [3] Solar activity level on the ascending phase of the solar cycle 23
    Maris, G
    Popescu, MD
    Oncica, A
    Donea, AC
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST SOLAR AND SPACE WEATHER EUROCONFERENCE ON THE SOLAR CYCLE AND TERRESTRIAL CLIMATE, 2000, 463 : 371 - 374
  • [4] Voyager 1 studies of the HMF to 81 AU during the ascending phase of solar cycle 23
    Burlaga, LF
    Ness, NF
    Wang, YM
    Sheeley, NR
    SOLAR WIND TEN, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 679 : 39 - 42
  • [5] Energetic particle observations by Ulysses during the declining phase of solar cycle 23
    Malandraki, O. E.
    Marsden, R. G.
    Tranquille, C.
    Forsyth, R. J.
    Elliott, H. A.
    Lanzerotti, L. J.
    Geranios, A.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2007, 112 (A6)
  • [6] The cathedral of Notre-Dame in Paris: Observations on the Gallery of Kings made during the restorations of 1998-1999
    Fonquerne, B
    BULLETIN MONUMENTAL, 1999, 157 (04): : 347 - 354
  • [7] OPTICAL OBSERVATIONS OF THE EVENINGSIDE UNDULATIONS DURING SOLAR CYCLE 23
    Baishev, D. G.
    Barkova, E. S.
    Fedorov, A. A.
    Yumoto, K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROBLEMS OF GEOCOSMOS, 2010, : 31 - 35
  • [8] Temporal Offsets Between Maximum CME Speed Index and Solar, Geomagnetic, and Interplanetary Indicators During Solar Cycle 23 and the Ascending Phase of Cycle 24
    Ozguc, A.
    Kilcik, A.
    Georgieva, K.
    Kirov, B.
    SOLAR PHYSICS, 2016, 291 (05) : 1533 - 1546
  • [9] Temporal Offsets Between Maximum CME Speed Index and Solar, Geomagnetic, and Interplanetary Indicators During Solar Cycle 23 and the Ascending Phase of Cycle 24
    A. Özgüç
    A. Kilcik
    K. Georgieva
    B. Kirov
    Solar Physics, 2016, 291 : 1533 - 1546
  • [10] Statistical analysis of outflow ionospheric O+ on the declining phase of solar cycle 23 using Fast observations
    Zhao, Kai
    Jiang, Yong
    Ding, Liu-Guan
    Huang, Lin-Feng
    PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2014, 101 : 170 - 180