Validation of ozone monitoring instrument nitrogen dioxide columns

被引:178
|
作者
Celarier, E. A. [1 ]
Brinksma, E. J. [2 ]
Gleason, J. F. [3 ]
Veefkind, J. P. [2 ]
Cede, A. [4 ]
Herman, J. R. [3 ]
Ionov, D. [5 ,6 ]
Goutail, F. [6 ]
Pommereau, J. -P. [6 ]
Lambert, J. -C. [7 ]
van Roozendael, M. [7 ]
Pinardi, G. [7 ]
Wittrock, F. [8 ]
Schoenhardt, A. [8 ]
Richter, A. [8 ]
Ibrahim, O. W. [9 ]
Wagner, T. [10 ]
Bojkov, B. [4 ]
Mount, G. [11 ]
Spinei, E. [11 ]
Chen, C. M. [12 ]
Pongetti, T. J. [12 ]
Sander, S. P. [12 ]
Bucsela, E. J. [4 ]
Wenig, M. O. [4 ]
Swart, D. P. J. [13 ]
Volten, H. [2 ,13 ]
Kroon, M. [2 ]
Levelt, P. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] SGT Inc, Greenbelt, MD 20770 USA
[2] Royal Netherlands Meteorol Inst, NL-3730 AE De Bilt, Netherlands
[3] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[4] Univ Maryland Baltimore Cty, GEST Program, Baltimore, MD 21250 USA
[5] St Petersburg State Univ, Phys Res Inst, Dept Atmospher Phys, St Petersburg 198904, Russia
[6] CNRS, F-91370 Verrieres Le Buisson, France
[7] Belgian Inst Space Aeron, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium
[8] Univ Bremen, Inst Environm Phys, D-28334 Bremen, Germany
[9] Heidelberg Univ, Inst Environm Phys, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[10] Max Planck Inst Chem, D-55128 Mainz, Germany
[11] Washington State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Lab Atmospher Res, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[12] CALTECH, Jet Prop Lab, NASA, Div Sci, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[13] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, NL-3720 BA Bilthoven, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2007JD008908
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
We review the standard nitrogen dioxide (NO2) data product (Version 1.0.), which is based on measurements made in the spectral region 415-465 nm by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) on the NASA Earth Observing System-Aura satellite. A number of ground- and aircraft-based measurements have been used to validate the data product's three principal quantities: stratospheric, tropospheric, and total NO2 column densities under nearly or completely cloud-free conditions. The validation of OMI NO2 is complicated by a number of factors, the greatest of which is that the OMI observations effectively average the NO2 over its field of view (minimum 340 km 2), while a ground- based instrument samples at a single point. The tropospheric NO2 field is often very inhomogeneous, varying significantly over tens to hundreds of meters, and ranges from <10(15) cm(-2) over remote, rural areas to >10(16) cm(-2) over urban and industrial areas. Because of OMI's areal averaging, when validation measurements are made near NO2 sources the OMI measurements are expected to underestimate the ground- based, and this is indeed seen. Further, we use several different instruments, both new and mature, which might give inconsistent NO2 amounts; the correlations between nearby instruments is 0.8-0.9. Finally, many of the validation data sets are quite small and span a very short length of time; this limits the statistical conclusions that can be drawn from them. Despite these factors, good agreement is generally seen between the OMI and ground- based measurements, with OMI stratospheric NO2 underestimated by about 14% and total and tropospheric columns underestimated by 15-30%. Typical correlations between OMI NO2 and ground- based measurements are generally >0.6.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effective cloud fractions from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: Theoretical framework and validation
    Stammes, P.
    Sneep, M.
    De Haan, J. F.
    Veefkind, J. P.
    Wang, P.
    Levelt, P. F.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2008, 113 (D16)
  • [22] Ground-based zenith sky abundances and in situ gas cross sections for ozone and nitrogen dioxide with the Earth Observing System Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument
    Dobber, M
    Dirksen, R
    Voors, R
    Mount, GH
    Levelt, P
    APPLIED OPTICS, 2005, 44 (14) : 2846 - 2856
  • [23] Study on calculation and validation of tropospheric ozone by ozone monitoring instrument - microwave limb sounder over China
    Hu, Yueming
    Yan, Huanhuan
    Zhang, Xingying
    Gao, Yi
    Zheng, Xiangdong
    Liu, Xuyan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 41 (23) : 9101 - 9120
  • [24] Sulfur dioxide emissions from Peruvian copper smelters detected by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument
    Carn, S. A.
    Krueger, A. J.
    Krotkov, N. A.
    Yang, K.
    Levelt, P. F.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 34 (09)
  • [25] Ozone profile retrievals from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument
    Liu, X.
    Bhartia, P. K.
    Chance, K.
    Spurr, R. J. D.
    Kurosu, T. P.
    ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2010, 10 (05) : 2521 - 2537
  • [26] Stratosphere-troposphere separation of nitrogen dioxide columns from the TEMPO geostationary satellite instrument
    Geddes, Jeffrey A.
    Martin, Randall V.
    Bucsela, Eric J.
    McLinden, Chris A.
    Cunningham, Daniel J. M.
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2018, 11 (11) : 6271 - 6287
  • [27] A GALVANIC SOLID-STATE SENSOR FOR MONITORING OZONE AND NITROGEN-DIOXIDE
    SUZUKI, S
    NAGASHIMA, K
    ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1982, 144 (DEC) : 261 - 266
  • [28] Ozone Monitoring Instrument geolocation verification
    Kroon, M.
    Dobber, M. R.
    Dirksen, R.
    Veefkind, J. P.
    van den Oord, G. H. J.
    Levelt, P. F.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2008, 113 (D15)
  • [29] Science objectives of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument
    Levelt, PF
    Hilsenrath, E
    Leppelmeier, GW
    van den Oord, GHJ
    Bhartia, PK
    Tamminen, J
    de Haan, JF
    Veefkind, JP
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 44 (05): : 1199 - 1208
  • [30] Ozone-Monitoring Instrument calibration
    Dobber, MR
    Dirksen, RJ
    Levelt, PF
    Van den Oord, GHJ
    Voors, RHM
    Kleipool, Q
    Jaross, G
    Kowalewski, M
    Hilsenrath, E
    Leppelmeier, GW
    de Vries, J
    Dierssen, W
    Rozemeijer, NC
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 44 (05): : 1209 - 1238