Sublingual hyoscyamine spray as premedication for colonoscopy: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled trial

被引:13
作者
Chaptini, Louis A. [1 ]
Janec, Eileen M. [1 ]
Seltzer, Gregory [1 ]
Peikin, Steven [1 ]
Elfant, Adam B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Cooper Univ Hosp, Div Gastroenterol & Liver Dis, Camden, NJ 08103 USA
关键词
colonoscopy; hyoscyamine; premedication;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.06.030
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Colonic motility and spasm during colonoscopy may affect duration and quality of the examination as well as patient comfort during and after the procedure. Previous studies assessing the utility of antispasmodic agents in colonoscopy demonstrated conflicting results. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of sublingual hyoscyamine spray (IB-Stat, Inkine Pharmaceutical) on the performance of colonoscopy. METHODS: One hundred patients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomized in a double-blind study to receive .25 mg sublingual hyoscyamine spray (n = 50: 25 men and 25 women, mean age 60) or placebo spray (n = 50: 23 men and 27 women, mean age 56) 15 to 30 minutes before the procedure. Parameters measured included time required to reach the cecum, total procedure time, endoscopist perception of colonic motility and difficulty of the procedure, and patient assessment of discomfort after the procedure. The latter parameters were measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale. A single endoscopist pet-formed all of the procedures. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, procedural difficulty scores and colonic motility scores were significantly lower in the hyoscyamine group compared with placebo (differences of 5.589 mm [P = .047] and 5.685 mm [P =. 040], respectively). Mean time to cecal intubation and percentage of patients with discomfort were slightly lower in the hyoscyamine group (5.68 minutes/48%) compared with placebo (5.92 minutes/57.1%), although the differences were not statistically significant (P = .57 and P = .36, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Procedural difficulty and colonic motility scores were significantly lower in subjects who received sublingual hyoscyamine before colonoscopy. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 55
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] CONTROLLED TRIAL OF PREMEDICATION WITH DICYCLOMINE HYDROCHLORIDE (BENTYL) IN COLONOSCOPY
    BOND, JH
    CHALLY, CH
    BLACKWOO.WD
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1974, 20 (02) : 61 - 61
  • [2] CHUNG M, 1996, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V91, P1966
  • [3] DOES ROUTINE INTRAVENOUS GLUCAGON ADMINISTRATION FACILITATE COLONOSCOPY - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL
    CUTLER, CS
    REX, DK
    HAWES, RH
    LEHMAN, GA
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 42 (04) : 346 - 350
  • [4] Sublingual hyoscyamine for patient comfort during screening sigmoidoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
    Dumot, JA
    Verzola, E
    Nicol, S
    Easley, KA
    Vargo, JJ
    van Stolk, RU
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 48 (03) : 283 - 286
  • [5] OUTPATIENT FLEXIBLE FIBEROPTIC SIGMOIDOSCOPY, DIAGNOSTIC YIELD AND THE VALUE OF GLUCAGON
    FOSTER, GE
    VELLACOTT, KD
    BALFOUR, TW
    HARDCASTLE, JD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1981, 68 (07) : 463 - 464
  • [6] Kazi N, 1996, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V43, P97
  • [7] A prospective, double-blind trial of L-hyoscyamine versus glucagon for the inhibition of small intestinal motility during ERCP
    Lahoti, S
    Catalano, MF
    Geenen, JE
    Hogan, WJ
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1997, 46 (02) : 139 - 142
  • [8] Benefit of intravenous antispasmodic (hyoscyamine sulfate) as premedication for colonoscopy
    Marshall, JB
    Patel, M
    Mahajan, RJ
    Early, DS
    King, PD
    Banerjee, B
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1999, 49 (06) : 720 - 726
  • [9] NORFLEET RG, 1983, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V29, P157