Shunt surgery in Europe and USA. A critical comparison

被引:0
|
作者
von Allmen, R. [1 ]
Konner, K.
Savolainen, H. [1 ]
Schmidli, J. [1 ]
Widmer, M. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Bern, Klin & Gefasschirurg, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
来源
GEFASSCHIRURGIE | 2007年 / 12卷 / 05期
关键词
haemodialysis; vascular access; arteriovenous fistula; access graft; haemodialysis catheter;
D O I
10.1007/s00772-007-0545-9
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Surgeons in USA and Europe initially followed the same path in surgery for the creation of arteriovenous fistulas, until from about 1975 US surgeons started to prefer to use prosthetic shunts. Prosthetic shunts were then used in up to 80% of primary procedures, with correspondingly high complication rates and high subsequent costs. With some local differences, in Europe the use of arteriovenous fistulas(AVF) is still preferred. The proportion of grafts used has never exceeded 40% in Europe. Since 1997, supported by newly created guidelines US physicians have been trying to reverse the trend and promote the use of AVF again. These efforts have resulted in a rising proportion of fistulas, but the early failure rate has been higher than in Europe. Apart from the guidelines, the most important task for vascular surgeons in both continents should be to ensure the cooperation of all medical specialities involved with the objectives of: - Implementation certified interdisciplinary courses whose content can be accepted by all concerned; - Establishment of reference centres with standardised, comprehensive documentation; - Maintenance of databases for quality control, with complication and patency rates easily called up; - standardisation of access surveillance and monitoring in dialysis units.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 373
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Shuntchirurgie in Europa und den USAEin kritischer VergleichShunt surgery in Europe and USAA critical comparison
    R. von Allmen
    K. Konner
    H. Savolainen
    J. Schmidli
    M.K. Widmer
    Gefässchirurgie, 2007, 12 (5) : 367 - 373
  • [2] Long-Term Survival for Hemodialysis Patients Differ in Japan Versus Europe and the USA. What Might the Reasons Be?
    Matsuda, Kenichi
    Fissell, Rachel
    Ash, Stephen
    Stegmayr, Bernd
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2018, 42 (12) : 1112 - 1118
  • [3] Current study situation on shunt surgery
    Kellersmann, R.
    Mickley, V.
    GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2010, 15 (08): : 579 - 588
  • [4] Quality in shunt surgery
    Cheseaux, Joane
    Widmer, Matthias K.
    Aregger, Fabienne
    Kohler, Corinne
    GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2023, 28 (08): : 574 - 580
  • [5] Shunt Surgery - Do we need Shunt Centres?
    Brunkwall, Jan
    Matoussevitch, Vladimir
    Konner, Klaus
    Schoeler, Claudia
    Bangard, Christopher
    Maintz, David
    Benzing, Thomas
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2012, 137 (05): : 397 - 400
  • [6] Not confirmed or expectable Benefit of a new Device in the Shunt Surgery
    Kroenung, G.
    GEFASSCHIRURGIE, 2019, 24 (04): : 341 - 343
  • [7] A rare complication of an Arteriovenous shunt after bimaxillary surgery
    Bouter, A. R.
    van Twisk, P. A.
    van Doormaal, P. J.
    Emmer, B. J.
    Koudstaal, M. J.
    JPRAS OPEN, 2021, 28 : 90 - 96
  • [8] Aktuelle Studienlage zur ShuntchirurgieCurrent study situation on shunt surgery
    R. Kellersmann
    V. Mickley
    Gefässchirurgie, 2010, 15 (8) : 579 - 588
  • [9] Experiences of out-patient arteriovenous shunt surgery.: A cost-benefit analysis
    Meyer, F
    Müller, JS
    Bürger, T
    Halloul, Z
    Lippert, H
    CHIRURG, 2002, 73 (03): : 274 - +
  • [10] The past and the future of vascular access surgery: Creation of percutaneous arteriovenous fistula using Ellipsys vascular access system in a patient with previous ipsilateral Scribner-shunt
    Shahverdyan, Robert
    Konner, Klaus
    Matoussevitch, Vladimir
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2021, 22 (06): : 1032 - 1035