Comparison of results of endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux in children using two bulking substances: Dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux) versus polyacrylate-polyalcohol copolymer (Vantris)

被引:18
作者
Warchol, Stanislaw [1 ]
Krzemien, Grazyna [2 ]
Szmigielska, Agnieszka [2 ]
Bombinski, Przemyslaw [3 ]
Brzewski, Michal [3 ]
Dudek-Warchol, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Paediat Surg & Urol, 63a Zwirki & Wigury St, PL-02091 Warsaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Paediat & Nephrol, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Paediat Radiol, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Vesicoureteral reflux; Endoscopic correction of VUR; Deflux; Vantris; VUR;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.04.006
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background Endoscopic correction of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in children offers minimally invasive management and is widely used as a first-line procedure for all grades of reflux. However, there is debate about which tissue-augmenting substance is the best to use. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two bulking substances, Deflux (Dx/HA) and Vantris (PPC), for endoscopic treatment of VUR in children. Methods From 2009 to 2012, 65 children (50 girls and 15 boys) aged 1.45-9.9 years (mean 4.85 +/- 2.52) underwent endoscopic correction of VUR using Deflux. VUR was unilateral in 31 patients and bilateral in 34 patients, comprising 108 renal refluxing units (RRUs) grades: II in 52, III in 47, IV in 7, and V in 2. From 2012, 68 children (43 girls and 25 boys) aged 0.6-17.9 years (mean 4.89 +/- 3.46) were treated with Vantris. VUR was unilateral in 33 and bilateral in 35 patients, comprising 109 RRUs grades: II in 48, III in 29, IV in 13, and V in 19. Voiding cystourethrogram was done 3 months after procedure. Results All patients completed follow-up (summary Table). With Deflux, reflux resolved in almost 93% of RRUs after two procedures (in 63% after first injection), with Vantris, VUR was corrected in the same percentage after one procedure. Discussion The success rate with Deflux ranges between 68% and 92% (only 50-70% after single injection). The reported possibility of reflux recurrence after successful Deflux treatment, and the need for repeated injection led to introduction of the new substance Vantris. The results of a multi-centre survey published in 2014 showed that reflux is corrected in more than 90% of cases after single PPC injection. Our results with PPC confirm a high level of reflux resolution. Conclusions Our data show that Vantris injection is a safe and effective procedure for treating all grades of VUR with good clinical outcome, and provides a higher and almost complete level of reflux resolution after first injection compared with Deflux.
引用
收藏
页码:256.e1 / 256.e4
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Asymptomatic chronic partial obstruction of a normal ureter following dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Deflux®) injection for grade I vesicoureteral reflux
    Arlen, Angela M.
    Pakalniskis, Brittany L.
    Cooper, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2012, 8 (03) : E27 - E30
  • [32] A novel endoscopic approach for management of hutch diverticulum concomitant vesicoureteral reflux with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer injection
    Langroudi, Ashkan Pourabhari
    Varniab, Zahra Shokri
    Nabavizadeh, Behnam
    Neishabouri, Afarin
    Kajbafzadeh, Abdol-Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2023, 19 (03) : 321.e1 - 321.e7
  • [33] Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer is effective in either double ureters or a small kidney
    Läckgren, G
    Wåhlin, N
    Sköldenberg, E
    Nevéus, T
    Stenberg, A
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (04) : 1551 - 1555
  • [34] Outcome analysis of mini-ureteroneocystostomy versus dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer injection for unilateral vesicoureteral reflux
    Ashley, Richard
    Vandersteen, David
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (04) : 1611 - 1613
  • [35] Risk factors for obstructive complications after endoscopic correction of vesico-ureteral reflux using polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer
    Sizonov, Vladimir V.
    Kagantsov, Ilya M.
    Mayr, Johannes M.
    Akramov, Nail R.
    Pirogov, Aleksandr, V
    Gasanov, Zhalil A.
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (22)
  • [36] A comparison of the double hydrodistention implantation technique (HIT) and the HIT with a polyacrylate/polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) for the endoscopic treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux
    Akin, Melih
    Erginel, Basak
    Karadag, Cetin Ali
    Yildiz, Abdullah
    Ozcelik, Gul Sumru
    Sever, Nihat
    Genc, Nimetullah Mete
    Dokucu, Ali Ihsan
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 46 (11) : 2057 - 2061
  • [37] Acute and delayed vesicoureteral obstruction after endoscopic treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux with dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer: Why and how to manage
    Garcia-Aparicio, L.
    Rodo, J.
    Palazon, P.
    Martin, O.
    Blazquez-Gomez, E.
    Manzanares, A.
    Garcia-Smith, N.
    Bejarano, M.
    de Haro, I.
    Ribo, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2013, 9 (04) : 493 - 497
  • [38] A comparison of the double hydrodistention implantation technique (HIT) and the HIT with a polyacrylate/polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) for the endoscopic treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux
    Melih Akin
    Basak Erginel
    Cetin Ali Karadag
    Abdullah Yildiz
    Gül Sumru Özçelik
    Nihat Sever
    Nimetullah Mete Genc
    Ali Ihsan Dokucu
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2014, 46 : 2057 - 2061
  • [39] Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux Using Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Copolymer in Children: Results of Postoperative Follow-Up with Real-Time 3D Sonography
    Pichler, Renate
    Buttazzoni, Alexander
    Bektic, Jasmin
    Schlenck, Barbara
    Radmayr, Christian
    Rehder, Peter
    Oswald, Josef
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2011, 87 (02) : 192 - 198
  • [40] Long-Term Followup After Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux with Dextranomer/Hyaluronic Acid Copolymer in Patients with Neurogenic Bladder
    Polackwich, A. S.
    Skoog, S. J.
    Austin, J. C.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 188 (04) : 1511 - 1515