Application of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Discriminating Benign, Borderline, and Malignant Serous Ovarian Tumors From Ultrasound Images

被引:32
作者
Wang, Huiquan [1 ]
Liu, Chunli [1 ]
Zhao, Zhe [1 ]
Zhang, Chao [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Xin [4 ]
Li, Huiyang [3 ]
Wu, Haixiao [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Xiaofeng [2 ]
Li, Chunxiang [2 ]
Qi, Lisha [2 ]
Ma, Wenjuan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tian Gong Univ, Sch Elect & Elect Engn, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Med Univ Canc Inst & Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Canc, Key Lab Canc Prevent & Therapy, Tianjins Clin Res Ctr Canc, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] Sino Russian Joint Res Ctr Bone Metastasis Malign, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Chengdu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
deep convolutional neural network; deep learning; ultrasound; serous ovarian tumor; transfer learning;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.770683
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the performance of the deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) to discriminate between benign, borderline, and malignant serous ovarian tumors (SOTs) on ultrasound(US) images. Material and MethodsThis retrospective study included 279 pathology-confirmed SOTs US images from 265 patients from March 2013 to December 2016. Two- and three-class classification task based on US images were proposed to classify benign, borderline, and malignant SOTs using a DCNN. The 2-class classification task was divided into two subtasks: benign vs. borderline & malignant (task A), borderline vs. malignant (task B). Five DCNN architectures, namely VGG16, GoogLeNet, ResNet34, MobileNet, and DenseNet, were trained and model performance before and after transfer learning was tested. Model performance was analyzed using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ResultsThe best overall performance was for the ResNet34 model, which also achieved the better performance after transfer learning. When classifying benign and non-benign tumors, the AUC was 0.96, the sensitivity was 0.91, and the specificity was 0.91. When predicting malignancy and borderline tumors, the AUC was 0.91, the sensitivity was 0.98, and the specificity was 0.74. The model had an overall accuracy of 0.75 for in directly classifying the three categories of benign, malignant and borderline SOTs, and a sensitivity of 0.89 for malignant, which was better than the overall diagnostic accuracy of 0.67 and sensitivity of 0.75 for malignant of the senior ultrasonographer. ConclusionDCNN model analysis of US images can provide complementary clinical diagnostic information and is thus a promising technique for effective differentiation of benign, borderline, and malignant SOTs.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A deep learning approach for real time prostate segmentation in freehand ultrasound guided biopsy [J].
Abu Anas, Emran Mohammad ;
Mousavi, Parvin ;
Abolmaesumi, Purang .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2018, 48 :107-116
[2]   MRI of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses [J].
Adusumilli, Saroja ;
Hussain, Hero K. ;
Caoili, Elaine M. ;
Weadock, William J. ;
Murray, John P. ;
Johnson, Timothy D. ;
Chen, Qixuan ;
Desjardins, Benoit .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2006, 187 (03) :732-740
[3]   Predicting Breast Cancer by Applying Deep Learning to Linked Health Records and Mammograms [J].
Akselrod-Ballin, Ayelet ;
Chorev, Michal ;
Shoshan, Yoel ;
Spiro, Adam ;
Hazan, Alon ;
Melamed, Roie ;
Barkan, Ella ;
Herzel, Esma ;
Naor, Shaked ;
Karavani, Ehud ;
Koren, Gideon ;
Goldscbmidt, Yaara ;
Shalev, Varda ;
Rosen-Zvi, Michal ;
Guindy, Michal .
RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (02) :331-342
[4]   Using Deep Learning and Transfer Learning to Accurately Diagnose Early-Onset Glaucoma From Macular Optical Coherence Tomography Images [J].
Asaoka, Ryo ;
Murata, Hiroshi ;
Hirasawa, Kazunori ;
Fujino, Yuri ;
Matsuura, Masato ;
Miki, Atsuya ;
Kanamoto, Takashi ;
Ikeda, Yoko ;
Mori, Kazuhiko ;
Iwase, Aiko ;
Shoji, Nobuyuki ;
Inoue, Kenji ;
Yamagami, Junkichi ;
Araie, Makoto .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 198 :136-145
[5]   Ovarian surface epithelium: Biology, endocrinology, and pathology [J].
Auersperg, N ;
Wong, AST ;
Choi, KC ;
Kang, SK ;
Leung, PCK .
ENDOCRINE REVIEWS, 2001, 22 (02) :255-288
[6]  
Deng J, 2009, PROC CVPR IEEE, P248, DOI 10.1109/CVPRW.2009.5206848
[7]   Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Borderline Ovarian Tumors [J].
Fischerova, Daniela ;
Zikan, Michal ;
Dundr, Pavel ;
Cibula, David .
ONCOLOGIST, 2012, 17 (12) :1515-1533
[8]   Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data [J].
Gillies, Robert J. ;
Kinahan, Paul E. ;
Hricak, Hedvig .
RADIOLOGY, 2016, 278 (02) :563-577
[9]   Man against machine: diagnostic performance of a deep learning convolutional neural network for dermoscopic melanoma recognition in comparison to 58 dermatologists [J].
Haenssle, H. A. ;
Fink, C. ;
Schneiderbauer, R. ;
Toberer, F. ;
Buhl, T. ;
Blum, A. ;
Kalloo, A. ;
Hassens, A. Ben Hadj ;
Thomas, L. ;
Enk, A. ;
Uhlmann, L. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2018, 29 (08) :1836-1842
[10]   A METHOD OF COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES DERIVED FROM THE SAME CASES [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 148 (03) :839-843