Challenges related to the analytical process in realist evaluation and latest developments on the use of NVivo from a realist perspective

被引:29
作者
Bergeron, Dave A. [1 ,2 ]
Gaboury, Isabelle [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Quebec Rimouski, Dept Nursing, 300 Allee Ursulines, Rimouski, PQ G5L 3A1, Canada
[2] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Family Med & Emergency Med, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Longueuil, PQ, Canada
关键词
Realist evaluation; qualitative data analysis software; NVivo; C-M-O configuration; CONTEXT; HEALTH; IMPLEMENTATION; INTERVENTION; MECHANISM; SYSTEMS; CARE;
D O I
10.1080/13645579.2019.1697167
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Realist evaluation (RE) is a research design increasingly used in program evaluation, that aims to explore and understand the influence of context and underlying mechanisms on intervention or program outcomes. Several methodological challenges, however, are associated with this approach. This article summarizes RE key principles and examines some documented challenges and solutions when analyzing RE data, including the development of Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations. An analytic method using NVivo features is also presented. This method makes it possible to respond to certain analytic difficulties associated with RE by facilitating the identification of patterns and ensuring transparency in the analytical process.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 365
页数:11
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] Lessons learned in using realist evaluation to assess maternal and newborn health programming in rural Bangladesh
    Adams, Alayne
    Sedalia, Saroj
    McNab, Shanon
    Sarker, Malabika
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2016, 31 (02) : 267 - 275
  • [2] Eliciting Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations: Experiences from a realist evaluation investigating the impact of robotic surgery on teamwork in the operating theatre
    Alvarado, Natasha
    Honey, Stephanie
    Greenhalgh, Joanne
    Pearman, Alan
    Dowding, Dawn
    Cope, Alexandra
    Long, Andrew
    Jayne, David
    Gill, Arron
    Kotze, Alwyn
    Randell, Rebecca
    [J]. EVALUATION, 2017, 23 (04) : 444 - 462
  • [3] [Anonymous], REDUIRE INEGALITES S
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2012, CJPE
  • [5] Astbury B., 2016, FUTURE EVALUATION GL, P309
  • [6] Some reflections on Pawson's Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto
    Astbury, Brad
    [J]. EVALUATION, 2013, 19 (04) : 383 - 401
  • [7] Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation
    Astbury, Brad
    Leeuw, Frans L.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EVALUATION, 2010, 31 (03) : 363 - 381
  • [8] The researchers' role in knowledge translation: a realist evaluation of the development and implementation of diagnostic pathways for cancer in two United Kingdom localities
    Banks, Jon
    Wye, Lesley
    Hall, Nicola
    Rooney, James
    Walter, Fiona M.
    Hamilton, Willie
    Gjini, Ardiana
    Rubin, Greg
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2017, 15
  • [9] Bergeron D. A., GLOBAL HLTH PR UNPUB
  • [10] Blaise P., 2010, Reduire les inegalites sociales en sante, P285