Critical Success Factors for Information Systems Development: A Case Study in e-Government

被引:3
作者
Guntur, Muhamad [1 ]
Purwandari, Betty [1 ]
Raharjo, Teguh [1 ]
Solichah, Iis [1 ]
Kumaralalita, Larastri [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Comp Sci, Depok, Indonesia
来源
2018 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (ICBIM 2018) | 2018年
关键词
Information Systems Development; Critical Success Factors; Analytic Hierarchy Process; e-Government; PROJECTS; AGILE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1145/3278252.3278288
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Information Systems (IS) development for government is prone to failure, which also happened to the development of Administration and Credit Information Systems (Sistem Informasi Pengadministrasian dan Angka Kredit or SIPARKIT) by the ICT unit at Finance Education and Training Agency (BPPK), Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia. This study investigates the Critical Success Factors (CSF) of the SIPARKIT to determine the priority of each CSF. These factors were identified from the literature and interviewed with SIPARKIT development team and experts in IS project management. The CSFs were then ranked using pair wise comparison questionnaire by the IS development team and high rank ICT officers. The data collected from the questionnaires were analyzed using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The results show that business process reengineering and system integration are the most important factor for the success of IS development. Other CSFs are project plan and schedule, team skills, competencies, and composition, top management support, and politics within the organization, communication, leadership, performance assessment, and knowledge management. Interviews with top management were also conducted to support the analysis results.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 33
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   A contingency fit model of critical success factors for software development projects A comparison of agile and traditional plan-based methodologies [J].
Ahimbisibwe, Arthur ;
Cavana, Robert Y. ;
Daellenbach, Urs .
JOURNAL OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 28 (01) :7-33
[2]  
Almajed AI, 2014, 2014 SCIENCE AND INFORMATION CONFERENCE (SAI), P984, DOI 10.1109/SAI.2014.6918305
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, GUID PROJ MAN BOD KN, V7th
[4]  
Fitrianah D., 2014, INT C ADV COMP SCI I
[5]  
Harold Kerzner., 2013, Project management metrics, KPIs and dashboards _ a guide to measuring and monitoring project performance
[6]  
Kolasa I, 2017, P 17 EUR C DIG GOV M, P326
[7]  
Kwak Y.H., 2014, Challenges Best Practices of Managing Government Projects Programs
[8]  
Lehman D., 2016, IDENTIFYING CRITICAL, P1
[9]  
Marchewka B. J. T, 2015, NATURE INFORM TECHNO, P1
[10]  
Schwalbe K., 2015, Information Technology Project Management