Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens

被引:72
作者
Wolc, Anna [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Arango, Jesus [5 ]
Settar, Petek [5 ]
Fulton, Janet E. [5 ]
O'Sullivan, Neil P. [5 ]
Preisinger, Rudolf [4 ]
Habier, David [2 ,3 ]
Fernando, Rohan [2 ,3 ]
Garrick, Dorian J. [2 ,3 ]
Dekkers, Jack C. M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Poznan Univ Life Sci, Dept Anim Breeding & Genet, PL-60637 Poznan, Poland
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Iowa State Univ, Ctr Integrated Anim Genom, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[4] Lohmann Tierzucht GmbH, D-27472 Cuxhaven, Germany
[5] Hy Line Int, Dallas Ctr, IA 50063 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
GENETIC-RELATIONSHIP INFORMATION; SELECTION; PREDICTION; IMPACT; TRAITS; CATTLE; BULLS;
D O I
10.1186/1297-9686-43-23
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Background: The predictive ability of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) originates both from associations between high-density markers and QTL (Quantitative Trait Loci) and from pedigree information. Thus, GEBV are expected to provide more persistent accuracy over successive generations than breeding values estimated using pedigree-based methods. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of GEBV in a closed population of layer chickens and to quantify their persistence over five successive generations using marker or pedigree information. Methods: The training data consisted of 16 traits and 777 genotyped animals from two generations of a brown-egg layer breeding line, 295 of which had individual phenotype records, while others had phenotypes on 2,738 non-genotyped relatives, or similar data accumulated over up to five generations. Validation data included phenotyped and genotyped birds from five subsequent generations (on average 306 birds/generation). Birds were genotyped for 23,356 segregating SNP. Animal models using genomic or pedigree relationship matrices and Bayesian model averaging methods were used for training analyses. Accuracy was evaluated as the correlation between EBV and phenotype in validation divided by the square root of trait heritability. Results: Pedigree relationships in outbred populations are reduced by 50% at each meiosis, therefore accuracy is expected to decrease by the square root of 0.5 every generation, as observed for pedigree-based EBV (Estimated Breeding Values). In contrast the GEBV accuracy was more persistent, although the drop in accuracy was substantial in the first generation. Traits that were considered to be influenced by fewer QTL and to have a higher heritability maintained a higher GEBV accuracy over generations. In conclusion, GEBV capture information beyond pedigree relationships, but retraining every generation is recommended for genomic selection in closed breeding populations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle [J].
Chen, L. ;
Schenkel, F. ;
Vinsky, M. ;
Crews, D. H., Jr. ;
Li, C. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (10) :4669-4678
[32]   Genetic parameters and accuracy of traditional and genomic breeding values for resistance to infectious bovine keratoconjunctivitis in Hereford [J].
Comin, H. B. ;
Campos, G. S. ;
Domingues, R. ;
Gaspar, E. B. ;
Sollero, B. P. ;
Cardoso, F. F. .
LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2022, 264
[33]   Improving accuracy of breeding values by incorporating genomic information in spatial-competition mixed models [J].
Cappa, Eduardo P. ;
El-Kassaby, Yousry A. ;
Munoz, Facundo ;
Garcia, Martin N. ;
Villalba, Pamela V. ;
Klapste, Jaroslav ;
Marcucci Poltri, Susana N. .
MOLECULAR BREEDING, 2017, 37 (10)
[34]   Persistency of accuracy of genomic breeding values for different simulated pig breeding programs in developing countries [J].
Akanno, E. C. ;
Schenkel, F. S. ;
Sargolzaei, M. ;
Friendship, R. M. ;
Robinson, J. A. B. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2014, 131 (05) :367-378
[35]   Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs [J].
Grossi, D. A. ;
Brito, L. F. ;
Jafarikia, M. ;
Schenkel, F. S. ;
Feng, Z. .
ANIMAL, 2018, 12 (11) :2235-2245
[36]   Accuracy of Igenity genomically estimated breeding values for predicting Australian Angus BREEDPLAN traits [J].
Boerner, V. ;
Johnston, D. ;
Wu, X. -L. ;
Bauck, S. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (02) :513-521
[37]   Improving accuracy of bulls' predicted genomic breeding values for fertility using daughters' milk progesterone profiles [J].
Tenghe, A. M. M. ;
Bouwman, A. C. ;
Berglund, B. ;
de Koning, D. J. ;
Veerkamp, R. F. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2018, 101 (06) :5177-5193
[38]   Comparison of Marker-Based Genomic Estimated Breeding Values and Phenotypic Evaluation for Selection of Bacterial Spot Resistance in Tomato [J].
Liabeuf, Debora ;
Sim, Sung-Chur ;
Francis, David M. .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2018, 108 (03) :392-401
[39]   Comparison of genetic parameters and estimated breeding values for worm resistance in meat sheep obtained using traditional and genomic models [J].
dos Santos, Gleyson Vieira ;
Santos, Natanael Pereira da Silva ;
Figueiredo Filho, Luiz Antonio Silva ;
Britto, Fabio Barros ;
Sena, Luciano Silva ;
Torres, Tatiana Saraiva ;
Carneiro, Paulo Luiz Souza ;
Sarmento, Jose Lindenberg Rocha .
TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2021, 53 (02)
[40]   Evaluation of genomic breeding values and accuracy for carcass traits in Korean Hanwoo cows using whole-genome SNP chip panels [J].
Jang, Ji-Hee ;
Lee, Han-Deul ;
Kim, Jong-Joo ;
Haque, Md Azizul .
MAMMALIAN GENOME, 2025,