Comparison of Morphological Similarities and Differences between Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Techniques of Serous Effusion Cytology Specimens

被引:3
作者
Baykus, Nurhan [1 ]
Oezekinci, Selver [2 ]
Erdem, Zeynep Betul [3 ]
Vurgun, Eren [4 ]
Yildiz, Fetin Rustu [5 ]
机构
[1] Kirklareli Training & Res Hosp, Dept Pathol, Kirklareli, Turkey
[2] Dicle Univ, Med Sch, Dept Pathol, Diyarbakir, Turkey
[3] Basaksehir Cam & Sakura City Hosp, Dept Pathol, Istanbul, Turkey
[4] Prof Dr Cemil Tascioglu City Hosp, Dept Biochem, Istanbul, Turkey
[5] Avcilar Hosp, Dept Pathol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Cytopreparations; Liquid-based cytology; Serous effusions; THINPREP;
D O I
10.1159/000521052
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Introduction: The aim of this study is to discover a fast and efficient method for the diagnosis of serous effusion cytology specimens by comparing the cytomorphological features of SurePath (SP) smears and smears prepared by cytospin. After the macroscopic features of the incoming material were recorded, it was divided into 2 for conventional technique (CT) and liquid-based technique. Cytospin was used for CT and SurePath for liquid-based technique in this study. Materials and Methods: 243 serous effusions (33 thoracentesis and 92 paracentesis fluids, 118 peritoneal lavage fluids) were investigated. After shaking the effusion gently, it was centrifuged for 5 min at 1,250 rpm for cytospin smear. SP smear was prepared according to the "BD PrepStain slide processor". Two smears were prepared with these 2 methods and then stained with Papanicolaou. The smears were examined under a light microscope in terms of fixation, background, cellularity, nucleus, and structural features. All statistical analysis of the data was performed using the SPSS 17.0 software. For each microscopic feature, the chi(2) test was used to assess the significance of the relationship between cytospin and SP, and level of agreement in between the methods was assessed using the kappa statistic. Results: A statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 methods in background (p < 0.001), cellularity (p < 0.001), nucleus features (p < 0.001), and structural features (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in fixation. Low level of agreement was observed with the kappa statistic in fixation, background, and cellularity. Moderate level of agreement was observed in the nucleus and structural feature groups with the kappa statistic. Discussion/Conclusion: Although there are advantages of liquid-based technique such as standardized fixation and cleaner background, since the cellular and background components required for morphological analysis and diagnosis are better preserved in cytospin, it is considered to be better to use liquid-based technique not alone but together with CT.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 164
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [11] 2-H
  • [12] Comparison of ThinPrep and TriPath PREP liquid-based preparations in nongynecologic specimens: A pilot study
    Michael, CW
    McConnel, J
    Pecott, J
    Afify, AM
    Al-Khafaji, B
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2001, 25 (03) : 177 - 184
  • [13] Moriarty AT, 2008, ARCH PATHOL LAB MED, V132, P1716, DOI 10.1043/1543-2165-132.11.1716
  • [14] Shambayati, 2011, CYTOPATHOLOGY, P209
  • [15] ANALYSIS OF DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF CYTOLOGICAL SMEAR METHOD VERSUS CELL BLOCK METHOD IN BODY FLUID CYTOLOGY: STUDY OF 150 CASES
    Viral, Bhanvadia M.
    Santwani, P. M.
    Vachhani, J. H.
    [J]. ETHIOPIAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCES, 2014, 24 (02) : 125 - 131