Major depressive symptoms in breast cancer patients with ovarian function suppression: a cross-sectional study comparing ovarian ablation and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists

被引:7
作者
Jiang, Junhan [1 ]
Xu, Junnan [2 ]
Cai, Li [3 ]
Man, Li [4 ]
Niu, Limin [5 ,6 ]
Hu, Juan [7 ]
Sun, Tao [2 ]
Zheng, Xinyu [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Dept Breast Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 155 Nanjing North St, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[2] China Med Univ, Dept Breast Med, Canc Hosp, Liaoning Canc 44 Xiaoheyan Rd, Shenyang 110042, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Med Univ, Dept Med Oncol 4, Canc Hosp, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China
[4] Anshan Canc Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Anshan 114000, Peoples R China
[5] Zhengzhou Univ, Breast Canc Ctr, Affiliated Canc Hosp, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China
[6] Henan Canc Hosp, Zhengzhou 450003, Peoples R China
[7] Hunan Canc Hosp, Dept Breast Canc Med Oncol, Changsha 410000, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; ovarian function suppression; major depressive symptoms; sexual dysfunction; quality of life; PREMENOPAUSAL PATIENTS; WOMEN; CHEMOTHERAPY; PREFERENCES; GOSERELIN; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12888-021-03611-6
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background Ovarian function suppression (OFS) is indicated in premenopausal women with early or metastasis breast cancer, which may be achieved with similar effect by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) or ovarian ablation (OA). We examined whether there were differences in major depressive symptoms outcomes and its associated factors between gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) and ovarian ablation (OA) in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Methods Premenopausal breast cancer patients from seven hospitals who received OFS participated in the study between June 2019 and June 2020. The correlated variable was the type of ovarian suppression, categorized as either OA (n = 174) or GnRHa (n = 389). Major depressive symptoms was evaluated using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire was used to assess sexual function. Results A total of 563 patients completed the surveys. The mean PHQ-9 sum score was slightly lower in the GnRHa cohort than in the OA cohort (11.4 +/- 5.7 vs. 12.8 +/- 5.8, P = 0.079). There were significantly fewer patients with major depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 >= 15) in the GnRHa cohort (31.1% vs. 40.2%, Exp (B)=1.805, P=0.004). Further, breast-conserving surgery and sexual dysfunction were negatively correlated with major depressive symptoms [mastectomy vs. breast-conserving: Exp (B) = 0.461, P <0.001;[sexual dysfunction vs. normal: Exp (B) = 0.512, P = 0.001]. Conclusions This is the first study to demonstrate that GnRHa results in more favorable depressive symptoms outcomes than OA. Moreover, most patients preferred alternatives to their OFS treatment. These findings can contribute to improving and alleviating the adverse effects of OFS.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Protective Effects of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist on Ovarian Functions in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy
    Wang, Chen
    Yu, Xing-Fei
    DISCOVERY MEDICINE, 2018, 25 (135) : 7 - 11
  • [22] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protects ovarian function in young patients with ovarian malignancy undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy: A prospective study
    Xie, Ya
    Duan, Haoran
    Wang, Dong
    Li, Huiqing
    Jia, Jia
    Zhang, Jialin
    Li, Linlin
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [23] Ovarian suppression using luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function and fertility of breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis of randomized studies
    Lambertini, M.
    Ceppi, M.
    Poggio, F.
    Peccatori, F. A.
    Azim, H. A., Jr.
    Ugolini, D.
    Pronzato, P.
    Loibl, S.
    Moore, H. C. F.
    Partridge, A. H.
    Bruzzi, P.
    Del Mastro, L.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 (12) : 2408 - 2419
  • [24] Ovarian protection with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy in cancer patients: From biological evidence to clinical application
    Lambertini, Matteo
    Horicks, Florence
    Del Mastro, Lucia
    Partridge, Ann H.
    Demeestere, Isabelle
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2019, 72 : 65 - 77
  • [25] Utility of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for prevention of chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage in premenopausal women with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shen, Yan-Wei
    Zhang, Xiao-Man
    Lv, Meng
    Chen, Ling
    Qin, Tian-Jie
    Wang, Fan
    Yang, Jiao
    Liu, Pei-Jun
    Yang, Jin
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2015, 8 : 2349 - 2359
  • [26] Comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists in assisted reproduction cycles of polycystic ovarian syndrome patients
    Hosseini, Marzieh Agha
    Aleyasin, Ashraf
    Saeedi, Hojjatollah
    Mahdavi, Atossa
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2010, 36 (03) : 605 - 610
  • [27] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs for ovarian function protection during chemotherapy in young early breast cancer patients: the last piece of the puzzle?
    Del Mastro, L.
    Lambertini, M.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2017, 28 (08) : 1683 - 1685
  • [28] Ovarian Function Suppression With Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists for the Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer in Premenopausal Women
    Lu, Yen-Shen
    Wong, Andrea
    Kim, Hee-Jeong
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [29] Concurrent treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for chemotherapy-induced ovarian damage in premenopausal women with breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Yang, Bo
    Shi, Weiwei
    Yang, Junlan
    Liu, Hui
    Zhao, Hong
    Li, Xiaoyan
    Jiao, Shunchang
    BREAST, 2013, 22 (02) : 150 - 157
  • [30] Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for ovarian protection during cancer chemotherapy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Senra, J. C.
    Roque, M.
    Talim, M. C. T.
    Reis, F. M.
    Tavares, R. L. C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 51 (01) : 77 - 86