The role of crisis in family crisis intervention: Do crisis experience and crisis change matter?

被引:9
作者
Al, Channa M. W. [1 ]
Stams, Geert Jan J. M. [1 ]
van der Laan, Peter H. [2 ,3 ]
Asscher, Jessica J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Fac Social & Behav Sci, Dept Forens Child & Youth Care Sci, NL-1090 GE Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Inst Study Crime & Law Enforcement NW, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Free Univ Amsterdam, Fac Law, Dept Criminol, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Crisis intervention; Family; Evaluation; Effectiveness; Perception; Child and youth care; PRESERVATION SERVICES; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.01.009
中图分类号
D669 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Evaluation studies of crisis intervention have focused on prevention of out-of-home placement of children or family functioning, but largely neglected the aspect of crisis. The present study examined crisis in 183 families receiving Family Crisis Intervention (FCI), addressing crisis characteristics and crisis change. In questionnaires children and parents were asked about their definition and experience of crisis and about their need for help. Results show that all families but one were in crisis at the beginning of the intervention, although the perception and extent of crisis differed among respondents. Crisis decreased from baseline to posttest according to clients and crisis intervention workers, but was not absent after the intervention. Combined with an unexpected pattern of reported family balance in the months before FCI, this result challenges the 4-6 weeks time span assumption of a crisis period. Variations in perception of crisis, clients' need for help, and possible crisis patterns are discussed, addressing theoretical and practical implications for family crisis intervention. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:991 / 998
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Evaluating family preservation services: Reframing the question of effectiveness [J].
Bagdasaryan, S .
CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2005, 27 (06) :615-635
[2]   INTENSIVE FAMILY PRESERVATION SERVICES WITH ABUSED AND NEGLECTED CHILDREN - AN EXAMINATION OF GROUP-DIFFERENCES [J].
BATH, HI ;
HAAPALA, DA .
CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT, 1993, 17 (02) :213-225
[3]   LOOKING BEYOND 30, 60, AND 90 DAYS [J].
BESHAROV, DJ .
CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 1994, 16 (5-6) :445-452
[4]   Formative evaluation in family preservation: Lessons from Nevada [J].
Bitonti, C .
CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2002, 24 (9-10) :653-672
[5]  
Callahan J, 1994, Crisis, V15, P164
[6]   Interagency practice in intensive family preservation services [J].
Campbell, L .
CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2002, 24 (9-10) :701-718
[7]  
Caplan G., 1964, PRINCIPLES PREVENTIV
[8]   An experimental study of the effectiveness of intensive in-home crisis services for children and their families: Program outcomes [J].
Evans, ME ;
Boothroyd, RA ;
Armstrong, MI ;
Greenbaum, PE ;
Brown, EC ;
Kuppinger, AD .
JOURNAL OF EMOTIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL DISORDERS, 2003, 11 (02) :92-+
[9]   The New York Presbyterian Pediatric Crisis Service [J].
Feiguine, RJ ;
Ross-Dolen, MM ;
Havens, J .
PSYCHIATRIC QUARTERLY, 2000, 71 (02) :139-152
[10]  
Fraser M.W., 1991, Families in crisis: The impact of intensive family preservation services