Outcomes to measure the effects of pharmacological interventions for pain management for women during labour and birth: a review of systematic reviews and randomised trials

被引:6
作者
Tan, A. [1 ]
Wilson, A. N. [1 ]
Eghrari, D. [1 ]
Clark, H. [1 ]
Tse, W. C. [2 ]
Bohren, M. A. [3 ]
Homer, C. S. E. [1 ]
Vogel, J. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Burnet Inst, Maternal Child & Adolescent Hlth Program, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Sch Med, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Equ, Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Gender & Womens Hlth Unit, Carlton, Vic, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Core outcome set; labour and birth; pain management; pharmacological interventions; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; MATERNAL SATISFACTION; COCHRANE REVIEWS; CORE; SET; CARE; QUESTIONNAIRE; CHILDBIRTH; EXPERIENCE; ANALGESIA;
D O I
10.1111/1471-0528.17031
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Pharmacological pain management options can relieve women's pain during labour and birth. Trials of these interventions have used a wide variety of outcomes, complicating meaningful comparisons of their effects. To facilitate better assessment of the effectiveness of labour pain management in trials and meta-analyses, consensus about key outcomes and the development of a core outcome set is essential. Objective To identify all outcomes used in studies of pharmacological pain management interventions during labour and birth. Design A review of systematic reviews and their included randomised controlled trials was undertaken. Search strategy Cochrane CENTRAL was searched to identify all Cochrane systematic reviews describing pharmacological pain management options for labour and birth. Search terms included 'pain management', 'labour' and variants, with no limits on year of publication or language. Selection criteria Cochrane reviews and randomised controlled trials contained within these reviews were included, provided they compared a pharmacological intervention with other pain management options, placebo or no treatment. Data collection and analysis All outcomes reported by reviews or trials were extracted and tabulated, with frequencies of individual outcomes reported. Main results Nine Cochrane reviews and 227 unique trials were included. In total, 146 unique outcomes were identified and categorised into maternal, fetal, neonatal, child, health service, provider's perspective or economic outcome domains. Conclusions Outcomes of pharmacological pain management interventions during labour and birth vary widely between trials. The standardisation of trial outcomes would permit the assessment of meta-analyses for best clinical practice. Tweetable abstract Outcomes to measure pharmacological pain management options during labour are highly variable and require standardisation.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 854
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Development of a core outcome set for epilepsy in pregnancy (E-CORE): a national multi-stakeholder modified Delphi consensus study [J].
Al Wattar, B. H. ;
Tamilselvan, K. ;
Khan, R. ;
Kelso, A. ;
Sinha, A. ;
Pirie, A. M. ;
McCorry, D. ;
Khan, K. S. ;
Thangaratinam, S. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 (04) :661-667
[2]   Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review [J].
Alfaro Blazquez, Ruben ;
Corchon, Silvia ;
Ferrer Ferrandiz, Esperanza .
MIDWIFERY, 2017, 55 :103-112
[3]   Performance of the Angle Labor Pain Questionnaire During Initiation of Epidural Analgesia in Early Active Labor [J].
Angle, Pamela J. ;
Landy, Christine Kurtz ;
Djordjevic, Jasmine ;
Barrett, Jon ;
Kibbe, Alanna ;
Sriparamananthan, Saiena ;
Lee, Yuna ;
Hamata, Lydia ;
Zaki, Pearl ;
Kiss, Alex .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 (06) :1546-1553
[4]   Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour (Review) [J].
Anim-Somuah, Millicent ;
Smyth, Rebecca M. D. ;
Cyna, Allan M. ;
Cuthbert, Anna .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (05)
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, J PERINAT EDUC, V22, P14, DOI [10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00218.x, 10.1891/1058-1243.22.1.14]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[7]  
Beigi Nastaran Mohammad Ali, 2010, Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res, V15, P77
[8]   A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data [J].
Breivik, EK ;
Björnsson, GA ;
Skovlund, E .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2000, 16 (01) :22-28
[9]   Multidimensional evaluation of pain during early and late labor: a comparison of nulliparous and multiparous women [J].
Capogna, G. ;
Camorcia, M. ;
Stirparo, S. ;
Valentini, G. ;
Garassino, A. ;
Farcomeni, A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 2010, 19 (02) :167-170
[10]   Moving Beyond the 0-10 Scale for Labor Pain Measurement [J].
Carvalho, Brendan ;
Mhyre, Jill M. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 123 (06) :1351-1353