Investigating students' experiences of Students as Partners (SaP) for basic need fulfilment: A self-determination theory perspective

被引:0
作者
Kaur, Amrita [1 ]
Noman, Mohammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utara Malaysia, Changlun, Malaysia
关键词
Students as Partners; higher education; self-determination theory; teaching and learning; student-faculty partnership; TEACHER AUTONOMY SUPPORT; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL NEEDS; SATISFACTION; ENGAGEMENT; WELL; WORK; COMPETENCE; SCHOOL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
There is sufficient evidence that suggests Student as Partners' (SaP) practices promote student motivation, engagement, and learning outcomes. This study attempts to understand the underlying mechanism of SaP and its potential to provide the motivational foundation for the students who engage in it and produce quality outcomes. We employ the self-determination theory's (SDT) framework to explain how the processes of partnership lead to students' psychological need satisfaction (autonomy, competence, and relatedness) in order to develop and maintain motivation. The data for this proposition was utilised from the two case studies (Author et al 2018; Author et al., 2017) that were conducted in partnership with students. The three constructs, autonomy, competence, and relatedness served as the framework that guided the data analysis. The findings establish that the social contextual factors posited by SDT for students' need satisfaction fittingly resonate with the principles and practices of SaP. Implications for SaP practitioners are discussed on how SaP can motivate students and sustain engagement
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, ASSESSMENT EVALUATIO
[2]  
[Anonymous], J HLTH PSYCHOL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1993, WHAT MATTERS COLL
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching: A guide for faculty
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1985, Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) Manual
[6]  
Barnes E., 2010, Staff-Student Partnerships in Higher Education, P16
[7]   Students as co-creators of teaching approaches, course design, and curricula: implications for academic developers [J].
Bovill, Catherine ;
Cook-Sather, Alison ;
Felten, Peter .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 16 (02) :133-145
[8]  
Bui Thi Thuy Hang, 2015, International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, V4, P1, DOI 10.4018/ijqaete.2015040101
[9]  
Chickering A.W., 1987, AM ASSOC HIGH EDUC B, V39, P3, DOI DOI 10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0
[10]  
Cliffe A., 2017, INT J STUD PART, V1, P1, DOI [https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v1i1.3194, DOI 10.15173/IJSAP.V1I1.3194]