Temporal changes in the most effective pollinator of a bromeliad pollinated by bees and hummingbirds

被引:13
作者
Barbosa Leal, Roberta Luisa [1 ]
Moreira, Marina Muniz [1 ,2 ]
Pinto, Alessandra Ribeiro [3 ]
Ferreira, Julia de Oliveira [1 ]
Rodriguez-Girones, Miguel [4 ]
Freitas, Leandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Pesquisas Jardim Bot Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Espirito Santo, Ctr Ciencias Agr, Alegre, ES, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Posgrad Ecol, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] Estn Expt Zonas Aridas, Almeria, Spain
关键词
Spatiotemporal variation; Effectiveness; Generalist pollination system Pollen limitation; Floral reflectance; Nectar; Bromeliaceae; Self-incompatibility; Tropical forest; Pollen robber; POLLEN LIMITATION; SPATIOTEMPORAL VARIATION; REPRODUCTIVE-BIOLOGY; SELF-INCOMPATIBILITY; BIMODAL POLLINATION; PLANT REPRODUCTION; RECEPTOR NOISE; EVOLUTION; PATTERNS; ASCLEPIAS;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.8836
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A generalist pollination system may be characterized through the interaction of a plant species with two or more functional groups of pollinators. The spatiotemporal variation of the most effective pollinator is the factor most frequently advocated to explain the emergence and maintenance of generalist pollination systems. There are few studies merging variation in floral visitor assemblages and the efficacy of pollination by different functional groups. Thus, there are gaps in our knowledge about the variation in time of pollinator efficacy and frequency of generalist species. In this study, we evaluated the pollination efficacy of the floral visitors of Edmundoa lindenii (Bromeliaceae) and their frequency of visits across four reproductive events. We analyzed the frequency of the three groups of floral visitors (large bees, small bees, and hummingbirds) through focal observations in the reproductive events of 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. We evaluated the pollination efficacy (fecundity after one visit) through selective exposure treatments and the breeding system by manual pollinations. We tested if the reproductive success after natural pollination varied between the reproductive events and also calculated the pollen limitation index. E. lindenii is a self-incompatible and parthenocarpic species, requiring the action of pollinators for sexual reproduction. Hummingbirds had higher efficacy than large bees and small bees acted only as pollen larcenists. The relative frequency of the groups of floral visitors varied between the reproductive events. Pollen limitation has occurred only in the reproductive event of 2017, when visits by hummingbirds were scarce and reproductive success after natural pollination was the lowest. We conclude that hummingbirds and large bees were the main and the secondary pollinators of E. lindenii, respectively, and that temporal variations in the pollinator assemblages had effects on its reproductive success. Despite their lower pollination efficacy, large bees ensured seed set when hummingbirds failed. Thus, we provide evidence that variable pollination environments may favor generalization, even under differential effectiveness of pollinator groups if secondary pollinators provide reproductive assurance.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Beyond the pollination syndrome: nectar ecology and the role of diurnal and nocturnal pollinators in the reproductive success of Inga sessilis (Fabaceae) [J].
Amorim, F. W. ;
Galetto, L. ;
Sazima, M. .
PLANT BIOLOGY, 2013, 15 (02) :317-327
[2]  
[Anonymous], SCI DATA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, J STAT SOFTW
[4]  
Armbruster W.S., 2000, SCANDINAVIAN ASS POL, V39, P179
[5]   Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: Ecological and evolutionary causes and consequences [J].
Ashman, TL ;
Knight, TM ;
Steets, JA ;
Amarasekare, P ;
Burd, M ;
Campbell, DR ;
Dudash, MR ;
Johnston, MO ;
Mazer, SJ ;
Mitchell, RJ ;
Morgan, MT ;
Wilson, WG .
ECOLOGY, 2004, 85 (09) :2408-2421
[6]  
Ashman TL, 2002, ECOLOGY, V83, P1175, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1175:TROHIT]2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
Benzing DH., 2000, BROMELIACEAE PROFILE
[9]   Why red flowers are not invisible to bees [J].
Chittka, L ;
Waser, NM .
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES, 1997, 45 (2-3) :169-183
[10]  
CHITTKA L, 1992, J COMP PHYSIOL A, V170, P533