Tackling the energy efficiency gap in the Irish residential sector

被引:3
作者
O'Callaghan, Andrew [1 ]
Purcell, Karl [1 ]
Hemmingway, Phil [2 ]
机构
[1] Sustainable Energy Author Ireland, Behav Econ Unit, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Sustainable Energy Author Ireland, Low Carbon Technol, Dublin, Ireland
关键词
climate change; energy; public policy; DISCOUNT RATES; CARBON TAX; PREFERENCES; DECISION; IMPACT; TRUST;
D O I
10.1680/jener.19.00043
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The residential sector holds significant potential for improvements in energy efficiency in Ireland. Retrofit activity, however, can be difficult to instigate despite the presence of government incentives and cost-effective investment opportunities. The failure of individuals and organisations to invest in cost-effective energy efficiency measures is often referred to as 'the energy efficiency gap'. Here, two separate, but not mutually exclusive, potential contributing factors for this phenomenon are discussed in detail: behavioural anomalies and modelling miscalculations. The relevance of these factors in the context of the Irish residential sector is introduced, and this is followed by a review of intervention literature seeking to increase energy efficiency programme adoption rates by addressing behavioural failures. An examination of domestic and international evidence shows a consistent overestimation by ex-ante models of energy-saving benefits. The paper concludes that addressing behavioural and informational factors can have a positive influence on energy efficiency adoption, but this needs to be complemented with additional policy measures to sufficiently rectify current low rates of uptake in the Irish residential sector. Simultaneously, further action will be needed to better calibrate engineering models using data gathered from ex-post field experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 59
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
  • [1] Factors influencing German house owners' preferences on energy retrofits
    Achtnicht, Martin
    Madlener, Reinhard
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2014, 68 : 254 - 263
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2013, REM HASSL FACT ASS L
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2017, Evaluating the Nest Learning Thermostat-Four Field Experiments Evaluating the Energy Saving Potential of Nest's Smart Heating Control
  • [4] BEIS (Department for Business Energy & Industrial Strategy), 2018, DIG UK EN STAT 2018
  • [5] Bell C., 2004, OPPORTUNITIES BEST P, V202, P429
  • [6] Brischke L-A., 2015, P EUROPEAN COUNCIL E, V2015, P1571
  • [7] Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax
    Bristow, Abigail L.
    Wardman, Mark
    Zanni, Alberto M.
    Chintakayala, Phani K.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2010, 69 (09) : 1824 - 1837
  • [8] Bruin K. C. De, 2018, EC SOCIAL RES INSTIT
  • [9] Chuang Y, 2019, ARE RESIDENTIAL ENER
  • [10] Darby S, 2018, ENERGY SUFFICIENCY I