Phase III trial of upfront debulking surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602

被引:53
作者
Onda, Takashi [1 ]
Matsumoto, Koji [2 ]
Shibata, Taro [3 ]
Sato, Akihiro [3 ]
Fukuda, Haruhiko [3 ]
Konishi, Ikuo [4 ]
Kamura, Toshiharu [5 ]
Yoshikawa, Hiroyuki [6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Div Gynecol Oncol, Chuo Ku, Tokyo 1040045, Japan
[2] Hyogo Canc Ctr, Div Med Oncol, Akashi, Hyogo, Japan
[3] Natl Canc Ctr, Ctr Canc Control & Informat Serv, JCOG Data Ctr, Tokyo 104, Japan
[4] Shinshu Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Matsumoto, Nagano 390, Japan
[5] Kurume Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fukuoka, Japan
[6] Univ Tsukuba, Inst Clin Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305, Japan
关键词
ovarian neoplasms; neoadjuvant therapy; interval debulking surgery; primary debulking surgery;
D O I
10.1093/jjco/hym145
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
On the basis of promising results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in our previous study (JCOG0206), we have been performing a Phase III study of treatment starting with NAC versus standard treatment starting with primary debulking surgery (PDS) for Stage III/IV mullerian carcinomas (ovarian, tubal and peritoneal carcinomas) since November 2006. The purposes are to prove the non-inferiority of the efficacy and to show the decrease in adverse effects resulting from reduced surgical invasiveness of treatment starting with NAC. Three hundred patients with advanced mullerian carcinomas will be randomized during 3 years. NAC arm patients undergo four cycles of NAC with paclitaxel plus carboplatin followed by interval debulking surgery and an additional four cycles of postsurgical chemotherapy. Standard arm patients undergo PDS and eight cycles of postsurgical chemotherapy with or without interval debulking surgery. The primary endpoint is overall survival. The major secondary endpoints are the incidence of adverse events and parameters representing surgical invasiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 77
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Critique of surgical cytoreduction in advanced ovarian cancer [J].
Covens, AL .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2000, 78 (03) :269-274
[2]  
Dauplat J, 2000, SEMIN SURG ONCOL, V19, P42, DOI 10.1002/1098-2388(200007/08)19:1<42::AID-SSU7>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-M
[4]   NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY AND INTERVAL DEBULKING FOR ADVANCED EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
JACOB, JH ;
GERSHENSON, DM ;
MORRIS, M ;
COPELAND, LJ ;
BURKE, TW ;
WHARTON, JT .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1991, 42 (02) :146-150
[5]  
Kayikçioglu F, 2001, INT J GYNECOL CANCER, V11, P466
[6]   Feasibility study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval cytoreductive surgery for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0206 [J].
Onda, T ;
Kamura, T ;
Ishizuka, N ;
Katsumata, N ;
Fukuda, H ;
Yoshikawa, H .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 34 (01) :43-45
[7]  
ONDA T, 2006, J CLIN ONCOL, V24, P15020
[8]  
Onnis A., 1996, European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology, V17, P393
[9]   Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: Long-term survival [J].
Schwartz, PE ;
Rutherford, TJ ;
Chambers, JT ;
Kohorn, EI ;
Thiel, RP .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1999, 72 (01) :93-99
[10]   Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary debulking surgery in advanced ovarian carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of 285 patients [J].
Vergote, I ;
De Wever, I ;
Tjalma, W ;
Van Gramberen, M ;
Decloedt, J ;
van Dam, P .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1998, 71 (03) :431-436