Invitation strategies for colorectal cancer screening programmes: The impact of an advance notification letter

被引:29
作者
Senore, Carlo [1 ]
Ederle, Andrea [2 ]
DePretis, Giovanni [3 ]
Magnani, Corrado [4 ]
Canuti, Debora [5 ]
Deandrea, Silvia [6 ]
Zorzi, Manuel [7 ]
Barca, Alessandra [8 ]
Bestagini, Piero [9 ]
Faitini, Katia [3 ]
Bisanti, Luigi [6 ]
Casale, Coralba [5 ]
Ferro, Antonio [10 ]
GiorgiRossi, Paolo [11 ]
Quadrino, Francesco [8 ]
Fiorina, Giorgia [1 ]
Capuano, Arianna [1 ]
Segnan, Nereo [1 ]
Fantin, Alberto [2 ]
机构
[1] CPO Piemonte, AOU Citta Salute & Sci, I-10123 Turin, Italy
[2] UO Gastroenterol, Osped Fracastoro, Bonifacio, VE, Italy
[3] UO Gastroenterol, Osped S Chiara, Trento, Italy
[4] Unversita Piemonte Orientate, CPO Piemonte, Novara, Italy
[5] AUSL Rimini, SS Programma Screening Oncol, Rimini, Italy
[6] ASL Citta Milano, Serv Epidemiol, Milan, Italy
[7] Registro Tumori Veneto, Padua, Italy
[8] Reg Lazio, Direz Reg Salute & Integraz Sociosanit, Rome, Italy
[9] UVOS, ASL Novara, Novara, Italy
[10] ASL 17 Este Monselice, Dipartimento Prevenz, Este, PD, Italy
[11] AUSL Reggio Emilia, Serv Interaziendale Epidemiol, Reggio Emilia, Italy
关键词
CRC screening; Sigmoidoscopy; Participation; FIT; DECISIONAL BALANCE; TRANSTHEORETICAL MODEL; MAMMOGRAPHY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.01.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Aim. To estimate the impact of an advance notification letter on participation in sigmoidoscopy (FS) and fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening. Methods. Eligible subjects, invited in 3 Italian population based programmes using FS and in 5 using FIT, were randomised (1:1:1), within GP, to: A) standard invitation letter; B) advance notification followed after 1 month by the standard invitation; and C) B + indication to contact the general practitioner (GP) to get advice about the decision to be screened. We calculated the 9-month attendance and the incremental cost of each strategy. We conducted a phone survey to assess GP's utilization and predictors of participation. Results. The advance notification was associated with a 20% increase in the attendance among 15,655 people invited for FS (B vs A - RR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.10-1.25; C vs A - RR: 1.19,95% CI: 1.12-1.27); the incremental cost ranged between 10 and 9 Euros. Participation in FIT screening (N = 23,543) was increased only with simple pre-notification (B vs A - RR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10); the incremental cost was 22.5 Euros. GP consultation rate was not increased in group C. Conclusions. An advance notification represents a cost-effective strategy to increase participation in FS screening; its impact on the response to FIT screening was limited. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:106 / 111
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, TREATING ADDICTIVE B
[2]   An advance notification letter increases participation in colorectal cancer screening [J].
Cole, S. R. ;
Smith, A. ;
Wilson, C. ;
Turnbull, D. ;
Esterman, A. ;
Young, G. P. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2007, 14 (02) :73-75
[3]   Use of a faecal immunochemical test narrows current gaps in uptake for sex, age and deprivation in a bowel cancer screening programme [J].
Digby, Jayne ;
McDonald, Paula J. ;
Strachan, Judith A. ;
Libby, Gillian ;
Steele, Robert J. C. ;
Fraser, Callum G. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2013, 20 (02) :80-85
[4]   Pre-notification increases uptake of colorectal cancer screening in all demographic groups: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Libby, Gillian ;
Bray, Jane ;
Champion, Jennifer ;
Brownlee, Linda A. ;
Birrell, Janice ;
Gorman, Dermot R. ;
Crighton, Emilia M. ;
Fraser, Callum G. ;
Steele, Robert J. C. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2011, 18 (01) :24-29
[5]   STAGES OF CHANGE AND DECISIONAL BALANCE FOR 12 PROBLEM BEHAVIORS [J].
PROCHASKA, JO ;
VELICER, WF ;
ROSSI, JS ;
GOLDSTEIN, MG ;
MARCUS, BH ;
RAKOWSKI, W ;
FIORE, C ;
HARLOW, LL ;
REDDING, CA ;
ROSENBLOOM, D ;
ROSSI, SR .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 13 (01) :39-46
[6]   WOMENS DECISION-MAKING ABOUT MAMMOGRAPHY - A REPLICATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STAGES OF ADOPTION AND DECISIONAL BALANCE [J].
RAKOWSKI, W ;
FULTON, JP ;
FELDMAN, JP .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 12 (03) :209-214
[7]   ASSESSING ELEMENTS OF WOMENS DECISIONS ABOUT MAMMOGRAPHY [J].
RAKOWSKI, W ;
DUBE, CE ;
MARCUS, BH ;
PROCHASKA, JO ;
VELICER, WF ;
ABRAMS, DB .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 11 (02) :111-118
[8]   Integrating pros and cons for mammography and pap testing: Extending the construct of decisional balance to two behaviors [J].
Rakowski, W ;
Clark, MA ;
Pearlman, DN ;
Ehrich, B ;
Rimer, BK ;
Goldstein, MG ;
Dube, CE ;
Woolverton, H .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1997, 26 (05) :664-673
[9]   Considerations for extending the transtheoretical model of behavior change to screening mammography [J].
Rakowski, W ;
Dube, CA ;
Goldstein, MG .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 1996, 11 (01) :77-96
[10]   Direct mailing of faecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening: a randomized population study from Central Italy [J].
Rossi, Paolo Giorgi ;
Grazzini, Grazia ;
Anti, Marcella ;
Baiocchi, Diego ;
Barca, Alessandra ;
Bellardini, Paola ;
Brezzi, Silvia ;
Camilloni, Laura ;
Falini, Patrizia ;
Maccallini, Vincenzo ;
Mantellini, Paola ;
Romeo, Daniele ;
Rubeca, Tiziana ;
Venditti, Maria Antonietta .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2011, 18 (03) :121-127