Facilitating knowledge transfer during SOX-mandated audit partner rotation

被引:18
作者
Sanders, Christina Butler [2 ]
Steward, Michelle D. [1 ]
Bridges, Sheri [1 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Calloway Sch Business & Accountancy, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
[2] Dixon Hughes PLLC, Asheville, NC 28806 USA
关键词
Knowledge management; Sarbanes-Oxley; Audit teams; Knowledge transfer; SARBANES-OXLEY-ACT; JOB ROTATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.bushor.2009.07.004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Audit teams are responsible for the discovery of the true financial state of a business. The ramifications of the quality of these efforts ripple throughout our economy. Requirements of Section 203 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX)-which mandates rotation of the audit team member who bears primary responsibility for the audit-began to take effect as recently as 2007-2008. The potential for knowledge loss within the audit team via this mandated rotation comes with great costs and risks for all stakeholders, as audit team members possess perhaps the most intimate knowledge of businesses. To aid in the prevention of knowledge loss and the facilitation of knowledge transfer from the outgoing to the incoming partner, we suggest four primary knowledge transfer approaches which may be used together in the post-SOX environment. These approaches are: (1) adequate planning of member rotation far in advance of the deadline for each partner; (2) consideration of strategic fit among the incoming partner, the client, the industry, and the team; (3) improved documentation of the outgoing partner's knowledge to be shared with the incoming partner; and (4) increased interaction among the rotating partners-outgoing and incoming-and the client to assist in the sharing of critical, yet difficult to transfer, tacit knowledge. (C) 2009 Kelley School of Business, Indiana University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:573 / 582
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] AICPA, 2004, SEC PRACT SECT MEMB
  • [2] American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 1978, DIV CPA FIRMS SEC PR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2003, Release No. 33-8183
  • [4] 34-47265
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, CPA J
  • [6] Mandatory rotation of company auditors: A critical examination
    Arrunada, B
    PazAres, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 1997, 17 (01) : 31 - 61
  • [7] Ballinger GA, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P118, DOI 10.2307/20159284
  • [8] Audit quality and properties of analyst earnings forecasts
    Behn, Bruce K.
    Choi, Jong-Hag
    Kang, Tony
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2008, 83 (02) : 327 - 349
  • [9] Managing business-to-business customer relationships following key contact employee turnover in a vendor firm
    Bendapudi, N
    Leone, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2002, 66 (02) : 83 - 101
  • [10] BIGGS SF, 1993, AUDITING-J PRACT TH, V12, P82