A pluralistic account of intellectual property

被引：29
作者：
Resnik, DB [1 ]
机构：
[1] E Carolina Univ, Brody Sch Med, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
来源：
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS | 2003年 / 46卷 / 04期
关键词：
Hegel; intellectual property; justice; Locke; pluralism; privacy; utilitarianism;
D O I：
10.1023/A:1025631902384
中图分类号：
F [经济];
学科分类号：
02 ;
摘要：
This essay reviews six different approaches to intellectual property. It and argues that none of these accounts provide an adequate justification of intellectual property laws and policies because (1) there are many different types of intellectual property, and (2) a variety of incommensurable values play a role in the justification of intellectual property. The best approach to intellectual property is to assess and balance competing moral values in light of the particular facts and circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码：319 / 335
页数：17
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]  
HETTINGER EC, 1989, PHILOS PUBLIC AFF, V18, P31
[22]  
HONORE A, 1977, NATURE PROCESS LAW, P370
[23]  
KUFLIK A, 1989, OWNING SCI TECHNICAL, P29
[24]  
LAFOLLETTE MC, 1992, STEALING PRINT
[25]  
Locke John., 1980, Second Treatise of Government, edited by
[26]  
MARTINUCCI ME, 1995, RIV ITAL PED, V21, P3
[27]  
MARX K, 1974, EC PHILOS MANUSCRIPT
[28]  
Marx Karl., 1998, The Communist Manifesto
[29]  
Marx Karl., 1996, KAPITAL
[30]  
MAY C, 1998, NEW POLIT ECON, V3, P59, DOI DOI 10.1080/13563469808406333
123456