A pluralistic account of intellectual property

被引:29
作者
Resnik, DB [1 ]
机构
[1] E Carolina Univ, Brody Sch Med, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
关键词
Hegel; intellectual property; justice; Locke; pluralism; privacy; utilitarianism;
D O I
10.1023/A:1025631902384
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This essay reviews six different approaches to intellectual property. It and argues that none of these accounts provide an adequate justification of intellectual property laws and policies because (1) there are many different types of intellectual property, and (2) a variety of incommensurable values play a role in the justification of intellectual property. The best approach to intellectual property is to assess and balance competing moral values in light of the particular facts and circumstances.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 335
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Andrews LB, 2001, BODY BAZAAR
  • [2] [Anonymous], BIOPIRACY PLUNDER NA
  • [3] [Anonymous], LAW 101
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1999, BLACKS LAW DICT, V7th
  • [5] [Anonymous], INTELLECTUAL PROPERT
  • [6] Avineri Schlomo., 1972, HEGELS THEORY MODERN
  • [7] BARLOW JP, 1994, WIRED, V2, P1
  • [8] Beauchamp TL, 2001, Principles of Biomedical Ethics
  • [9] Public goods and fair prices - Balancing technological innovation with social well-being
    Brody, B
    [J]. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1996, 26 (02) : 5 - 11
  • [10] Drahos Peter., 1996, PHILOS INTELLECTUAL