The Garbage Can Model: A Study in (Non)Reproducible Research

被引:0
作者
Levin, Stewart A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
computational modeling; organizational behavior; reproducibility;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O1 [数学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The classic paper "A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice" by Cohen, March and Olsen (1972) both heralded a significant expansion of the study of organizational decision making to non-industrial settings, in particular universities, and served as a very early example of reproducible computational research, incorporating a Fortran 66 program in its appendix to permit others to reproduce their results and run further examples. In this work my extensive attempts to perfectly reproduce the original results show the inherent challenge of reproducing computational research in the presence of ever-changing computing platforms and technology. Indeed, exact values could not be reproduced in this study, nor any other published study, because of hypersensitivity. Despite this, additional statistics allowed by modern computer capabilities almost completely agree with the qualitative observations and conclusions in the original work. Finally, in light of the need for high precision, it will be worthwhile to retest and reevaluate later studies of the internal dynamics of the model that faulted the code for behavior at odds with the theory.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 465
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ITK: enabling reproducible research and open science
    McCormick, Matthew
    Liu, Xiaoxiao
    Jomier, Julien
    Marion, Charles
    Ibanez, Luis
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS, 2014, 8
  • [22] A Study on the Performance of Reproducible Computations
    Bombace, Nico
    Weiland, Michele
    HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING: ISC HIGH PERFORMANCE 2019 INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOPS, 2020, 11887 : 441 - 451
  • [23] A generic approach for reproducible model distillation
    Zhou, Yunzhe
    Xu, Peiru
    Hooker, Giles
    MACHINE LEARNING, 2024, 113 (10) : 7645 - 7688
  • [24] Pisum sativum has no competitive responses to neighbors: A case study in non reproducible plant biology
    Mobley, Mariah L.
    Kruse, Audrey S.
    McNickle, Gordon G.
    PLANT DIRECT, 2022, 6 (10)
  • [25] Quantitative methods I: Reproducible research and quantitative geography
    Brunsdon, Chris
    PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2016, 40 (05) : 687 - 696
  • [26] CCTAA: A Reproducible Corpus for Chinese Authorship Attribution Research
    Wang, Haining
    Riddell, Allen
    LREC 2022: THIRTEEN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, 2022, : 5889 - 5893
  • [27] Towards Reproducible Research of Event Detection Techniques for Twitter
    Weiler, Andreas
    Schilling, Harry
    Kircher, Lukas
    Grossniklaus, Michael
    2019 6TH SWISS CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE (SDS), 2019, : 69 - 74
  • [28] Reproducible Pattern Recognition Research: The Case of Optimistic SSL
    Krijthe, Jesse H.
    Loog, Marco
    REPRODUCIBLE RESEARCH IN PATTERN RECOGNITION, RRPR 2016, 2017, 10214 : 48 - 59
  • [29] Administrative social science data: The challenge of reproducible research
    Playford, Christopher J.
    Gayle, Vernon
    Connelly, Roxanne
    Gray, Alasdair J. G.
    BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2016, 3 (02):
  • [30] A Checklist for Reproducible Computational Analysis in Clinical Metabolomics Research
    Du, Xinsong
    Aristizabal-Henao, Juan J.
    Garrett, Timothy J.
    Brochhausen, Mathias
    Hogan, William R.
    Lemas, Dominick J.
    METABOLITES, 2022, 12 (01)