Research priorities for pregnancy hypertension: a UK priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance

被引:11
|
作者
Ho, Alison [1 ]
Webster, Louise [1 ]
Bowen, Liza [2 ]
Creighton, Fiona
Findlay, Sarah
Gale, Chris [3 ]
Green, Marcus [4 ]
Gronlund, Toto [5 ]
Magee, Laura A. [1 ]
McManus, Richard J. [6 ]
Mistry, Hiten D. [7 ]
Singleton, Gemma
Thornton, Jim [7 ]
Whybrow, Rebecca [1 ]
Chappell, Lucy [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sch Life Course Sci, Women & Childrens Hlth, London, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Sch Populat Hlth & Environm Sci, London, England
[3] Imperial Coll London, Neonatal Med, Sch Publ Hlth, London, England
[4] Stables, Act Preeclampsia, Evesham, England
[5] Natl Inst Hlth Res Evaluat, Trials & Studies Coordinating Ctr, James Lind Alliance, Southampton, Hants, England
[6] Univ Oxford, Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Oxford, England
[7] Univ Nottingham, Sch Med, Div Child Hlth Obstet & Gynaecol, Nottingham, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2020年 / 10卷 / 07期
关键词
obstetrics; hypertension; maternal medicine; primary care; neonatology; GESTATIONAL HYPERTENSION; PREECLAMPSIA; CLINICIAN; HEALTH; RISK; TERM;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036347
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To identify research priorities for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy from individuals with lived experience and healthcare professionals. Design Prospective surveys and consensus meetings using principles outlined by the James Lind Alliance. Setting UK. Methods A steering group was established and 'uncertainties' were gathered using an online survey and literature search. An interim online survey ranked long-listed questions and the top 10 research questions were reached by consensus at a final prioritisation workshop. Participants Women, partners, relatives and friends of those with lived experience of pregnancy hypertension, researchers and healthcare professionals. Results The initial online survey was answered by 278 participants (180 women with lived experience, 9 partners/relatives/friends, 71 healthcare professionals and 18 researchers). Together with a literature search, this identified 764 questions which were refined into 50 summary questions. All summary questions were presented in an interim prioritisation survey that was answered by 155 participants (87 women with lived experience, 4 partners/relatives/friends, 49 healthcare professionals and 15 researchers). The top 25 highest ranked questions were considered by the final prioritisation workshop. The top 10 uncertainties were identified by consensus and ranked as follows in order of priority: long-term consequences of pregnancy hypertension (for the woman and baby), short-term complications of pregnancy hypertension (for the woman and baby), screening tests for pre-eclampsia, prevention of long-term problems (for the woman and baby), causes of pregnancy hypertension, prevention of recurrent pregnancy hypertension, educational needs of healthcare professionals, diagnosis of pre-eclampsia, management of pregnancy hypertension, provision of support for women and families. Conclusions Research priorities shared by those with lived experience of pregnancy hypertension and healthcare professionals have been identified. Researchers should use these to inform the choice of future studies in this area.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Top 10 research priorities for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Australia: James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Chiletti, Roberto
    Vodopic, Courtney
    Hunt, Emiko
    Lawer, Jess
    Bertinetti, Monique
    Malarbi, Stephanie
    Kyritsis, Valerie
    Petersen, Scott
    Stewart, David
    Hellstern, Jean
    Stewart, Michael
    Hickey, Leah
    Tingay, David G.
    Prentice, Trisha M.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2024,
  • [42] Identifying the top research priorities in postmastectomy breast cancer reconstruction: a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
    Zhong, Toni
    Mahajan, Anisha
    Cowan, Katherine
    Temple-Oberle, Claire
    Porter, Geoff
    LeBlanc, Martin
    Metcalfe, Kelly
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (08):
  • [43] Top 10 research priorities for congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Australia: James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Chiletti, Roberto
    Vodopic, Courtney
    Hunt, Emiko
    Lawer, Jess
    Bertinetti, Monique
    Malarbi, Stephanie
    Kyritsis, Valerie
    Petersen, Scott
    Stewart, David
    Hellstern, Jean
    Stewart, Michael
    Hickey, Leah
    Tingay, David G.
    Prentice, Trisha M.
    ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2025, 110 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [44] Top ten research priorities for type 2 diabetes: results from the Diabetes UK-James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Finer, Sarah
    Robb, Paul
    Cowan, Katherine
    Daly, Ann
    Robertson, Elizabeth
    Farmer, Andrew
    LANCET DIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 5 (12): : 935 - 936
  • [45] Top ten research priorities for breathlessness research: UKJames Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
    Evans, Rachael A.
    Lo, David K. H.
    Reilly, Charles C.
    Davies, Martin R.
    Walker, Samantha
    Kennington, Erika J.
    LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2025, 13 (01): : e1 - e2
  • [46] Identifying research priorities for digital technology in mental health care: results of the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Hollis, Chris
    Sampson, Stephanie
    Simons, Lucy
    Davies, E. Bethan
    Churchill, Rachel
    Betton, Victoria
    Butler, Debbie
    Chapman, Kathy
    Easton, Katherine
    Gronlund, Toto Anne
    Kabir, Thomas
    Rawsthorne, Mat
    Rye, Elizabeth
    Tomlin, Andre
    LANCET PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 5 (10): : 845 - 854
  • [47] Identifying the top research priorities in medically not yet explained symptoms (MNYES): a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership
    van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina Maria
    Sweetman, Jennifer
    Edwards, Mark
    Gall, Nicholas
    Gilligan, Jennifer
    Hayle, Stephanie
    Kaul, Arvind
    Moriarty, Andrew Stephen
    Perros, Petros
    Sampford, James
    Smith, Natalie
    Elfeddali, Iman
    Varley, Danielle
    Gower, Jonathan
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (07):
  • [48] Shared research priorities for pessary use in women with prolapse: results from a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership
    Lough, Kate
    Hagen, Suzanne
    McClurg, Doreen
    Pollock, Alex
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (04):
  • [49] Rare musculoskeletal diseases in adults: a research priority setting partnership with the James Lind Alliance
    Gerda Mickute
    Kristina Staley
    Heather Delaney
    Oliver Gardiner
    Amy Hunter
    Richard Keen
    Lorraine Lockhart
    Nick Meade
    Maria Newman
    Stuart Ralston
    Elaine Rush
    Sheela Upadhyaya
    Sandra Regan
    Laura Watts
    Jennifer Walsh
    Paul White
    Roger M. Francis
    M. Kassim Javaid
    Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 15
  • [50] Research priorities in infertility and assisted reproductive technology treatments - a James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership with brazilian patients
    Lorenzon, Aline R.
    Garcia, Desiree
    Silva, Leticia
    de Oliveira, Cristiane Araujo
    Chehin, Mauricio B.
    Marinho, Ricardo Mello
    Junqueira Caetano, Joao Pedro
    Vassena, Rita
    Alves da Motta, Eduardo Leme
    JORNAL BRASILEIRO DE REPRODUCAO ASSISTIDA, 2020, 24 (03): : 265 - 272