3D Forward and Back-Projection for X-Ray CT Using Separable Footprints

被引:180
作者
Long, Yong [1 ]
Fessler, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
Balter, James M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Elect Engn & Comp Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cone-beam tomography; forward and back-projection; iterative tomographic image reconstruction; DISTANCE-DRIVEN PROJECTION; CONE-BEAM RECONSTRUCTION; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; BACKPROJECTION SCHEME; ALIASING ARTIFACTS; PARALLEL-BEAM; ALGORITHM; EDGE;
D O I
10.1109/TMI.2010.2050898
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Iterative methods for 3D image reconstruction have the potential to improve image quality over conventional filtered back projection (FBP) in X-ray computed tomography (CT). However, the computation burden of 3D cone-beam forward and back-projectors is one of the greatest challenges facing practical adoption of iterative methods for X-ray CT. Moreover, projector accuracy is also important for iterative methods. This paper describes two new separable footprint (SF) projector methods that approximate the voxel footprint functions as 2D separable functions. Because of the separability of these footprint functions, calculating their integrals over a detector cell is greatly simplified and can be implemented efficiently. The SF-TR projector uses trapezoid functions in the transaxial direction and rectangular functions in the axial direction, whereas the SF-TT projector uses trapezoid functions in both directions. Simulations and experiments showed that both SF projector methods are more accurate than the distance-driven (DD) projector, which is a current state-of-the-art method in the field. The SF-TT projector is more accurate than the SF-TR projector for rays associated with large cone angles. The SF-TR projector has similar computation speed with the DD projector and the SF-TT projector is about two times slower.
引用
收藏
页码:1839 / 1850
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Fessler JA., 2000, Handbook of Medical Imaging, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1117/3.831079.CH1, DOI 10.1117/3.831079]
  • [12] Cone-beam reprojection using projection-matrices
    Galigekere, RR
    Wiesent, K
    Holdsworth, DW
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2003, 22 (10) : 1202 - 1214
  • [13] NON-LINEAR PARTIAL VOLUME ARTIFACTS IN X-RAY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    GLOVER, GH
    PELC, NJ
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1980, 7 (03) : 238 - 248
  • [14] Ultra fast symmetry and SIMD-based projection-backprojection (SSP) algorithm for 3-D PET image reconstruction
    Hong, I. K.
    Chung, S. T.
    Kim, H. K.
    Kim, Y. B.
    Son, Y. D.
    Cho, Z. H.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2007, 26 (06) : 789 - 803
  • [15] Joseph P M, 1982, IEEE Trans Med Imaging, V1, P192, DOI 10.1109/TMI.1982.4307572
  • [16] THE EXPONENTIAL EDGE-GRADIENT EFFECT IN X-RAY COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY
    JOSEPH, PM
    SPITAL, RD
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1981, 26 (03) : 473 - 487
  • [17] Hyperfast parallel-beam and cone-beam backprojection using the cell general purpose hardware
    Kachelriess, Marc
    Knaup, Michael
    Bockenbach, Olivier
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (04) : 1474 - 1486
  • [18] Kak A.C. Slaney M., 1999, PRINCIPLES COMPUTERI
  • [19] Sampling and aliasing consequences of quarter-detector offset use in helical CT
    La Rivière, PJ
    Pan, XC
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2004, 23 (06) : 738 - 749
  • [20] Statistical approaches in quantitative positron emission tomography
    Leahy, RM
    Qi, JY
    [J]. STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2000, 10 (02) : 147 - 165