How to get and keep your lab funded

被引:0
作者
Chernoff, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1091/mbc.E18-07-0416
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Much has been written about the seemingly capricious manner by which grant proposals are ranked and awarded by the National Institutes of Health and similar agencies, yet some scientists are able to maintain stable funding over long periods of time. While raw luck may certainly play a role in this process, particularly when paylines are tight, it is also possible that skill-in the art of grant writing at least-could represent a decisive factor. Here, I submit that, even as we attempt to reform and one day perfect the grant review process, there are actions that applicants can take today to get better results from the system we have.
引用
收藏
页码:2519 / 2521
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Risk evaluation in peer review of grant applications
    Gallo S.
    Thompson L.
    Schmaling K.
    Glisson S.
    [J]. Environment Systems and Decisions, 2018, 38 (2) : 216 - 229
  • [2] Healing the NIH-Funded Biomedical Research Enterprise
    Germain, Ronald N.
    [J]. CELL, 2015, 161 (07) : 1485 - 1491
  • [3] Haven Kendall., 2007, Story Proof: The Science Behind the Startling Power of Story
  • [4] Lake E, 2010, THE NATIONAL
  • [5] Lee C, 2007, WASH POST
  • [6] Taking Risks to Transform Science
    Maxmen, Amy
    [J]. CELL, 2009, 139 (01) : 13 - 15
  • [7] McNeil B, 2014, ARS TECHNICA
  • [8] Narrative and "Anti-narrative" in Science: How Scientists Tell Stories, and Don't
    Padian, Kevin
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE AND COMPARATIVE BIOLOGY, 2018, 58 (06) : 1224 - 1234
  • [9] Voosen P., 2015, CHRONICLE HIGHER ED
  • [10] Williams T., 1986, SCI HITTING, V2nd