Bone properties surrounding hydroxyapatite-coated custom osseous integrated dental implants

被引:31
作者
Baker, M. I. [3 ]
Eberhardt, A. W. [3 ]
Martin, D. M.
McGwin, G. [2 ]
Lemons, J. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Prosthodont, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
[2] Univ Alabama, Dept Epidemiol, Birmingham, AL USA
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Biomed Engn, Birmingham, AL 35294 USA
关键词
bone; hydroxyapatite; dental implants; nanoindentation; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; HISTOMORPHOMETRIC EVALUATION; ELASTIC-MODULUS; NANOINDENTATION; INTERFACE; CEMENT; RESORPTION; COMPONENTS; FIXATION; COATINGS;
D O I
10.1002/jbm.b.31693
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Calcium phosphate (hydroxyapatite or HA) coatings have been applied to Custom Osseous Integrated Implants (COIIs) to improve the quality of the bone-implant integration, yet little is known concerning the biomechanical properties of bone surrounding the HA-coated implants in humans over the long term. The purpose of this study was to characterize the mechanical and histomorphometric properties of the bone along the implant interface. Specimens were prepared from three similar mandibular implants that were functional in three female patients for about 11 years. Histomorphometric analyses showed bone-implant contact averaging 75% for all specimens. Area coverage of residual HA-coating ranged from 52 to 70%. When compared with previous studies, these results show a relatively high percentage of residual HA after a decade in vivo. Nanoindentation showed similar average values of hardness and modulus (p = 0.53 and p = 0.56, respectively) comparing bone adjacent to residual HA-coating and regions where the coating was absent. The elastic modulus was significantly lower for bone near the bone-implant interface (<200 mu m) as compared with bone distant (>1000 mu m) from the interface (p = 0.05), thereby reflecting different properties of the bone near these interfaces. Backscattered electron imaging showed darker gray levels which indicated decreased mineral content in bone adjacent to the implant, consistent with the nanoindentation results. (C) 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 95B: 218-224, 2010.
引用
收藏
页码:218 / 224
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Degradation of hydroxyapatite coating on a well-functioning femoral component [J].
Aebli, N ;
Krebs, J ;
Schwenke, D ;
Stich, H ;
Schawalder, P ;
Theis, JC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2003, 85B (04) :499-503
[2]  
Amet EM, 1996, J PROSTHET DENT, V75, P347, DOI 10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90504-1
[3]   HYDROXYAPATITE-COATED FEMORAL STEMS - HISTOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPONENTS RETRIEVED AT AUTOPSY [J].
BAUER, TW ;
GEESINK, RCT ;
ZIMMERMAN, R ;
MCMAHON, JT .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1991, 73A (10) :1439-1452
[4]  
BLOEBAUM RD, 1991, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P97
[5]  
Brunski J B, 1999, Adv Dent Res, V13, P99
[6]   BONE RESPONSE TO HYDROXYAPATITE-COATED AND COMMERCIALLY PURE TITANIUM IMPLANTS IN THE HUMAN ARTHRITIC KNEE [J].
CARLSSON, L ;
REGNER, L ;
JOHANSSON, C ;
GOTTLANDER, M ;
HERBERTS, P .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1994, 12 (02) :274-285
[7]   Elasticity of alveolar bone near dental implant-bone interfaces after one month's healing [J].
Chang, MC ;
Ko, CC ;
Liu, CC ;
Douglas, WH ;
DeLong, R ;
Seong, WJ ;
Hodges, J ;
An, KN .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 36 (08) :1209-1214
[8]   Nanoscale characterization of bone-implant interface and biomechanical modulation of bone ingrowth [J].
Clark, Paul A. ;
Clark, Andrew M. ;
Rodriguez, Anthony ;
Hussain, Mohammad A. ;
Mao, Jeremy J. .
MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-BIOMIMETIC AND SUPRAMOLECULAR SYSTEMS, 2007, 27 (03) :382-393
[9]   HYDROXYLAPATITE COATING OF POROUS IMPLANTS IMPROVES BONE INGROWTH AND INTERFACE ATTACHMENT STRENGTH [J].
COOK, SD ;
THOMAS, KA ;
DALTON, JE ;
VOLKMAN, TK ;
WHITECLOUD, TS ;
KAY, JF .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1992, 26 (08) :989-1001
[10]   THE ADVANTAGES OF COATED TITANIUM IMPLANTS PREPARED BY RADIOFREQUENCY SPUTTERING FROM HYDROXYAPATITE [J].
COOLEY, DR ;
VANDELLEN, AF ;
BURGESS, JO ;
WINDELER, AS .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 67 (01) :93-100