A Restorative Response to Victims in Proceedings before the International Criminal Court: Reality or Chimaera?

被引:0
作者
Cuppini, Alessandra [1 ]
机构
[1] Open Univ, Milton Keynes, Bucks, England
关键词
victim's participation; international criminal court; restorative justice; JUSTICE; PARTICIPATION; TRIAL; IDENTITIES; RAPE;
D O I
10.1163/15718123-bja10041
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The integration of the framework of victims' participation into the legal proceeding of the International Criminal Court (ICC) has been seen as a transformation of the ICC process beyond narrow retribution to better accommodate restorative justice (RJ) values and practices. However, there is little research into whether, or how the ICC metes out RJ. This article argues that RJ principles brought within ICC emphasise the growing importance that victims' participation in proceedings plays in achieving justice for victims. It then examines how the ICC process aligns to the key elements of RJ practice, namely victim-offender meeting; offender's acknowledgement of responsibility and apology; collaborative conflict-resolution approach; victims' healing and reconciliation; symbolic reparation and material restitution. This article demonstrates that these elements, developed to address ordinary juvenile criminality, are not structured to operate in the particular context of the ICC, characterised by grave harm caused to victims and communities by mass atrocity.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 341
页数:29
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   Remote Victimisation and the Proximate Cause. Transgenerational Harms before the International Criminal Court [J].
Gacka, Patryk .
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW, 2022, 22 (03) :438-474
[32]   Admissibility and Jurisdiction before the International Criminal Court Regarding the Boko Haram Situation in Nigeria [J].
Quadri, Kafayat Motilewa ;
Jan, Mohammad Naqib Ishan ;
Wahab, Mohd. Iqbal Abdul ;
Ahamat, Haniff .
PERTANIKA JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE AND HUMANITIES, 2015, 23 :97-108
[33]   Victims' right to a fair trial at the International Criminal Court: reflections on Article 68(3) of the Rome Statute [J].
Masinde, Michael Wabomba .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND CONSTITUTIONAL STUDIES, 2016, 4 (04) :280-294
[34]   THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT AND ITS TRUST FUND ARE COMING OF AGE: TOWARDS A PROCESS APPROACH FOR THE REPARATION OF VICTIMS [J].
Rombouts, Heidy ;
Parmentier, Stephan .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF VICTIMOLOGY, 2009, 16 (02) :149-182
[35]   Exclusion of Illicit Evidence and the Integrity of Proceedings: An Interpretation of Article 69(7) (b) of the Rome Statute in the Precedents of the International Criminal Court [J].
Pedro de Souza, Joao .
ANUARIO IBEROAMERICANO DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PENAL, 2022, 10
[36]   Virtual Presence: Exploring the Impact of Accused's Remote Participation on Fair Trial Rights Before the International Criminal Court [J].
Dubuc, Cloe .
TILBURG LAW REVIEW-JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND EUROPEAN LAW, 2024, 29 (02) :87-104
[37]   Taking Illegal Amnesties Seriously: Threefold Approach to the Admissibility Test before the International Criminal Court [J].
Ochi, Megumi .
INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW, 2023, 23 (04) :580-602
[38]   Challenges and Perspectives of Reparations for Victims of Sexual and Gender-Based Crimes: An analysis of the International Criminal Court precedents' [J].
Silva Batista, Clara .
ANUARIO IBEROAMERICANO DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PENAL, 2023, 11
[39]   Why the International Crminal Court Should Apply Restorative Justice and Transitional Justice Principles to Improve the Impact of Its Criminal Trials on Societies around the World [J].
Sarkin, Jeremy Julian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSITIONAL JUSTICE, 2025,
[40]   #AUSPOL #WARCRIMES #ICC: exploring the social media response to a communication to the International Criminal Court [J].
Hodgson, Natalie .
GRIFFITH LAW REVIEW, 2024, 33 (02) :125-147