Copycat and lookalike edible cannabis product packaging in the United States

被引:20
作者
Ompad, Danielle C. [1 ,2 ]
Snyder, Kyle M. [1 ]
Sandh, Simon [1 ]
Hagen, Daniel [1 ]
Collier, Kewanda J. [3 ]
Goldmann, Emily [1 ,2 ]
Goodman, Melody S. [1 ]
Tan, Andy S. L. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] New York Univ, Sch Global Publ Hlth, 708 Broadway, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Ctr Drug Use & HIV HCV Res, 708 Broadway, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Morgan State Univ, Sch Community Hlth & Policy, 4530 Portage Ave Campus,1700 E Cold Spring Lane, Baltimore, MD 21251 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Annenberg Sch Commun, 3620 Walnut St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Colonial Penn Ctr, 3641 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Cannabis; Marijuana; Edibles; Packaging; Copycat; Lookalike; MARIJUANA; STUDENTS; SCHOOL; SNACKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109409
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recent media reports have highlighted copycat/lookalike cannabis edibles as a public health concern. No empirical papers have described this phenomenon.Methods: From May 2020-August 2021, we collected photos of cannabis products via an online survey of cannabis users and through personal contacts. Copycat/lookalike products are defined as those that use the same or similar brand name, logo, and/or imagery as an existing commercial non-cannabis counterpart (CNCC). We assessed each package for similarities with its CNCC with respect to brand name, product name, font, color, flavors, and brand/promotional characters. We examined cannabis content indicators including: THC content per package and serving, cannabis leaf symbol, product warnings, cannabis terms, cannabis motifs, activation time, and guidance on edible use.Results: We collected photos of 731 cannabis products; 267 (36%) were edibles of which 22 (8%) represented 13 unique copycat/lookalike products. Eight used exact brand/product names as existing CNCCs, and five used similar names. Packages copied or imitated a mean of 3.9 of six features and indicated cannabis content with a mean of 4.1 of eight features. Thirteen packages indicated a mean THC content of 459 mg/package. Four reported THC dose per serving, with a mean dose of 47.5 mg.Conclusions: Our content analysis highlights three key concerns. First, copycat/lookalike edibles subtly indicate cannabis content while using high fidelity replication or imitation of their CNCC. Second, THC content is high and there were multiple 10 mg THC doses in the equivalent of 1 serving of a CNCC. Third, these products may be attractive to children.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   New product trial, use of edibles, and unexpected highs among marijuana and hashish users in Colorado [J].
Allen, Jane A. ;
Davis, Kevin C. ;
Duke, Jennifer C. ;
Nonnemaker, James M. ;
Bradfield, Brian R. ;
Farrelly, Matthew C. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2017, 176 :44-47
[2]  
Aubin D., 2019, REUTERS
[3]   Subjective effects of combustible, vaporized, and edible cannabis: Results from a survey of adolescent cannabis users [J].
Boisvert, Esthelle Ewusi ;
Bae, Dayoung ;
Pang, Raina D. ;
Davis, Jordan P. ;
Kelley-Quon, Lorraine I. ;
Barrington-Trimis, Jessica L. ;
Kirkpatrick, Matthew G. ;
Chai, Stephanie H. ;
Leventhal, Adam M. .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2020, 206
[4]  
California Department of Cannabis Control, 2021, CAL COD REG TITL 4 D
[5]  
Chesler C., 2021, WASH POST
[6]  
Gilbertson John, 2020, IDEA, V60, P502
[7]   Consumers' Perceptions of Edible Marijuana Products for Recreational Use: Likes, Dislikes, and Reasons for Use [J].
Giombi, Kristen C. ;
Kosa, Katherine M. ;
Rains, Carrie ;
Cates, Sheryl C. .
SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2018, 53 (04) :541-547
[8]   A comparative analysis of laws on recreational cannabis edibles between Canada and the United States of America [J].
Goundar, Priyashni ;
Macaulay, Tim ;
Szafron, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2021, 94
[9]   Effects of Offering Look-Alike Products as Smart Snacks in Schools [J].
Harris, Jennifer L. ;
Hyary, Maia ;
Schwartz, Marlene B. .
CHILDHOOD OBESITY, 2016, 12 (06) :432-439
[10]  
Healy J., 2012, New York Times