共 50 条
Hemodynamic Basis of Exercise Limitation in Patients With Heart Failure and Normal Ejection Fraction
被引:264
|作者:
Maeder, Micha T.
[1
,2
]
Thompson, Bruce R.
Brunner-La Rocca, Hans-Peter
[3
]
Kaye, David M.
[1
,2
]
机构:
[1] Baker IDI Heart & Diabet Inst, Heart Failure Res Grp, Melbourne, Vic 8008, Australia
[2] Alfred Hosp, Ctr Heart, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Maastricht, Dept Cardiol, Maastricht, Netherlands
基金:
英国医学研究理事会;
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词:
echocardiography;
ejection fraction;
exercise;
heart failure;
hemodynamics;
DOPPLER-ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;
DIASTOLIC FUNCTION;
ACTIVE RELAXATION;
RECOMMENDATIONS;
ABNORMALITIES;
GUIDELINES;
DIAGNOSIS;
STIFFNESS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jacc.2010.04.040
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Objectives The purpose of this study was to invasively investigate the hemodynamic response to exercise in patients with heart failure with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) and to evaluate the ability of the peak early diastolic transmitral velocity to peak early diastolic annular velocity ratio (E/e') to reflect exercise hemodynamics. Background There is little information regarding the hemodynamic response to exercise in HFNEF. Methods Patients with HFNEF (n = 14) and asymptomatic controls (n = 8) underwent right-side heart catheterization at rest and during supine cycle ergometer exercise and echocardiography with measurement of resting and peak exercise E/e'. Results Resting pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (10 +/- 4 mm Hg vs. 10 +/- 4 mm Hg; p = 0.94) was similar in HFNEF patients and controls, but stroke volume index (SVI) (p = 0.02) was lower, and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) (p = 0.01) was higher in patients. Patients stopped exercise at lower work rate (0.63 +/- 0.29 W/kg vs. 1.13 +/- 0.49 W/kg; p = 0.006). Although peak exercise PCWP was similar in both groups (23 +/- 6 mm Hg vs. 20 +/- 7 mm Hg; p = 0.31), the peak PCWP/work rate ratio was higher in patients compared with controls (46 +/- 31 mm Hg/W/kg vs. 20 +/- 9 mm Hg/W/kg; p = 0.03). Peak exercise SVI (p = 0.001) was lower and SVRI was higher (p = 0.01) in patients. Resting E/e' was modestly elevated in patients (13.2 +/- 4.1 vs. 9.5 +/- 3.4; p = 0.04). Peak exercise E/e' did not differ between the groups (11.1 +/- 3.4 vs. 9.4 +/- 3.4; p +/- 0.28). Conclusions The HFNEF patients achieved a similar peak exercise PCWP to that of asymptomatic controls, at a much lower workload. This occurs at a lower SVI and in the setting of higher SVRI. The E/e' does not reflect the hemodynamic changes during exercise in HFNEF patients. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56:855-63) (C) 2010 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:855 / 863
页数:9
相关论文