Management of Pigweed (Amaranthus spp.) in Glufosinate-Resistant Soybean in the Midwest and Mid-South

被引:30
作者
Butts, Thomas R. [1 ,3 ]
Norsworthy, Jason K. [2 ]
Kruger, Greg R. [3 ]
Sandell, Lowell D. [4 ,10 ]
Young, Bryan G. [5 ,11 ]
Steckel, Lawrence E. [6 ]
Loux, Mark M. [7 ]
Bradley, Kevin W. [8 ]
Conley, Shawn P. [1 ]
Stoltenberg, David E. [1 ]
Arriaga, Francisco J. [9 ]
Davis, Vince M. [1 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Agron, 1575 Linden Dr, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Dept Crop Soil & Environm Sci, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, North Platte, NE 69101 USA
[4] Univ Nebraska, Dept Agron & Hort, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[5] So Illinois Univ, Dept Plant Soil & Agr Syst, Carbondale, IL 62901 USA
[6] Univ Tennessee, Dept Plant Sci, Jackson, TN 38301 USA
[7] Ohio State Univ, Dept Hort & Crop Sci, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[8] Univ Missouri, Dept Plant Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[9] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Soil Sci, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[10] Valent USA Corp, Lincoln, NE 68505 USA
[11] Purdue Univ, Dept Bot & Plant Pathol, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[12] BASF Corp, Verona, WI 53593 USA
关键词
Cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation; cultural weed control; digital imagery analysis; glufosinate-resistant soybean; integrated weed management; PRE herbicides; INTEGRATED WEED MANAGEMENT; SEEDING RATE; HERBICIDE RESISTANCE; LIGHT INTERCEPTION; MULTIPLE RESISTANCE; GLYCINE-MAX; ROW WIDTH; YIELD; RESPONSES; PALMERI;
D O I
10.1614/WT-D-15-00076.1
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Pigweeds are among the most abundant and troublesome weed species across Midwest and midSouth soybean production systems because of their prolific growth characteristics and ability to rapidly evolve resistance to several herbicide sites of action. This has renewed interest in diversifying weed management strategies by implementing integrated weed management (IWM) programs to efficiently manage weeds, increase soybean light interception, and increase grain yield. Field studies were conducted across 16 site-years to determine the effectiveness of soybean row width, seeding rate, and herbicide strategy as components of IWM in glufosinate-resistant soybean. Sites were grouped according to optimum adaptation zones for soybean maturity groups (MGs). Across all MG regions, pigweed density and height at the POST herbicide timing, and end-of-season pigweed density, height, and fecundity were reduced in IWM programs using a PRE followed by (fb) POST herbicide strategy. Furthermore, a PRE fb POST herbicide strategy treatment increased soybean cumulative intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (CIPAR) and subsequently, soybean grain yield across all MG regions. Soybean row width and seeding rate manipulation effects were highly variable. Narrow row width (<= 38 cm) and a high seeding rate (470,000 seeds ha(-1)) reduced end-of-season height and fecundity variably across MG regions compared with wide row width (>= 76 cm) and moderate to low (322,000 to 173,000 seeds ha(-1)) seeding rates. However, narrow row widths and high seeding rates did not reduce pigweed density at the POST herbicide application timing or at soybean harvest. Across all MG regions, soybean CIPAR increased as soybean row width decreased and seeding rate increased; however, row width and seeding rate had variable effects on soybean yield. Furthermore, soybean CIPAR was not associated with end-of-season pigweed growth and fecundity. A PRE fb POST herbicide strategy was a necessary component for an IWM program as it simultaneously managed pigweeds, increased soybean CIPAR, and increased grain yield.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 365
页数:11
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Quick Stats
[2]   Soybean Seeding Rate Effects on Weed Management [J].
Arce, Guillermo D. ;
Pedersen, Palle ;
Hartzler, Robert G. .
WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 23 (01) :17-22
[3]   Evaluation of solar radiation prediction models in North America [J].
Ball, RA ;
Purcell, LC ;
Carey, SK .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2004, 96 (02) :391-397
[4]   Multiple Resistance to Herbicides from Four Site-of-Action Groups in Waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) [J].
Bell, Michael S. ;
Hager, Aaron G. ;
Tranel, Patrick J. .
WEED SCIENCE, 2013, 61 (03) :460-468
[5]  
Bensch CN, 2003, WEED SCI, V51, P37, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2003)051[0037:IORPAR]2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   SOYBEAN YIELD COMPONENT RESPONSES TO A LIGHT INTERCEPTION GRADIENT DURING THE REPRODUCTIVE PERIOD [J].
BOARD, JE ;
HARVILLE, BG .
CROP SCIENCE, 1993, 33 (04) :772-777
[8]   AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
BOX, GEP ;
COX, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1964, 26 (02) :211-252
[9]   Branch yield components controlling soybean yield stability across plant populations [J].
Carpenter, AC ;
Board, JE .
CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (03) :885-891
[10]  
Conley S.P., 2010, Factors to consider if using lower soybean seeding rates in 2010