Aerodynamic performance and flow evolution of a high-speed train exiting a tunnel with crosswinds

被引:30
作者
Wang, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Luo, Jianjun [1 ,2 ]
Li, Feilong [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Dilong [3 ,4 ]
Gao, Liping [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Dengke [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Key Lab Urban Underground Engn, Minist Educ, 3 Shangyuancun, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Beijings Key Lab Struct Wind Engn & Urban Wind En, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mech, Key Lab Mech Fluid Solid Coupling Syst, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Mech, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
High-speed train (HST); Crosswinds; Aerodynamic performance; Computational fluid dynamics (CFD); WIND CONDITIONS; RAIL VEHICLES; AMBIENT WIND; MODEL; STABILITY; BRIDGE; SIMULATION; FORCES; LOADS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jweia.2021.104786
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Sudden changes in the aerodynamic loads acting on trains can result in derailment or overturning. The impacts of infrastructure scenarios on the aerodynamic performance of trains are significant. When high-speed trains travel from one infrastructure scenario to another one, the aerodynamic loads and flow field will change suddenly. It is a commonly in western China for HSTs to exit a tunnel with crosswinds. In order to investigate the aerodynamic loads and the flow evolution, a three-dimensional, compressible, unsteady Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes method was utilized to simulate the process of a train exiting a tunnel under crosswinds. Results show that the flow field and the pressure varied significantly in the horizonal plane while the train exited the tunnel under crosswinds. In addition, the aerodynamic loads of each carriage which varied abruptly resulted in complex dynamic responses of the train including lateral variation, snake-like locomotion, and pitching motion. Furthermore, the variation magnitudes of Delta C-side, Delta C-lift, and Delta C-RM for the head carriage were 4.1, 2.2 and 1.6 times for the middle carriage, and 7.9, 8.1 and 8.2 times for the rear carriage. Therefore, the aerodynamic performance of the head carriage was the worst and the risk of accidents was the highest under crosswinds.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, 140676 BS EN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Q. Rep. RTRI, DOI DOI 10.2219/RTRIQR.57.155
[3]   The simulation of unsteady aerodynamic cross wind forces on trains [J].
Baker, C. J. .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2010, 98 (02) :88-99
[4]   Cross-wind effects on road and rail vehicles [J].
Baker, Chris ;
Cheli, Federico ;
Orellano, Alexander ;
Paradot, Nicolas ;
Proppe, Carsten ;
Rocchi, Daniele .
VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2009, 47 (08) :983-1022
[5]   Measurements of the cross wind forces on trains [J].
Baker, CJ ;
Jones, J ;
Lopez-Calleja, F ;
Munday, J .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2004, 92 (7-8) :547-563
[6]   THE DETERMINATION OF TOPOGRAPHICAL EXPOSURE FACTORS FOR RAILWAY EMBANKMENTS [J].
BAKER, CJ .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1985, 21 (01) :89-99
[7]   TRAIN AERODYNAMIC FORCES AND MOMENTS FROM MOVING MODEL EXPERIMENTS [J].
BAKER, CJ .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1986, 24 (03) :227-251
[8]   The alleviation of the aerodynamic drag and wave effects of high-speed trains in very long tunnels [J].
Baron, A ;
Mossi, M ;
Sibilla, S .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2001, 89 (05) :365-401
[9]   Crosswind action on rail vehicles: Wind tunnel experimental analyses [J].
Bocciolone, Marco ;
Cheli, Federico ;
Corradi, Roberto ;
Muggiasca, Sara ;
Tomasini, Gisella .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2008, 96 (05) :584-610
[10]   An evaluation of RANS turbulence modelling for aerodynamic applications [J].
Catalano, P ;
Amato, M .
AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 7 (07) :493-509