Sharing Facilities and Administrative Cost Recovery to Facilitate Interdisciplinary Research

被引:6
作者
Kulage, Kristine M. [1 ]
Larson, Elaine L. [2 ]
Begg, Melissa D. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Sch Nursing, Off Scholarship & Res, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Mailman Sch Publ Hlth, New York, NY 10032 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, Irving Inst Clin & Translat Res, New York, NY 10032 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
TEAMS;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0b013e31820924ea
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Purpose Despite increasing interest in interdisciplinary research, researchers consistently cite institutional barriers as deterrents. Researchers, administrators, and others have suggested developing processes for sharing facilities and administrative (F&A) cost recovery as one way to support collaborative research. Therefore, the authors reviewed current policies for sharing F&A cost recovery and user satisfaction with them. Method In 2010, through reviewing institutional Web sites and surveying researchers and grants administrators from a range of institutions, the authors identified different policies currently employed and assessed user satisfaction with them. Results Whereas most respondents (80.7%, 205/254) agreed that a standard policy for sharing F&A cost recovery would facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration, only 35.4% (90/254) reported that their institutions had such a policy. Among the 85 respondents who answered questions about their institution's policy, most (66 [77.6%]) reported that the policy applied to grants with multiple principal investigators or coinvestigators across departments or schools, and 68 (80.0%) reported satisfaction with the policy. Respondents from institutions with policies were significantly more likely to endorse the notion that policies are helpful compared with those who reported that their institutions did not have such policies or were unsure of their existence (89% versus 76%, P = .014). The authors detected no significant differences in satisfaction scores based on policy type, whether determined by investigator effort, space allocation, or other considerations (P = .29). Conclusions These data support the need for institutions to establish formal policies for sharing F&A cost recovery as a way to promote interdisciplinary research collaboration.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 401
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
[11]  
*GUST AD COLL, PROGR INC POL
[12]   The collaboration readiness of transdisciplinary research teams and centers - Findings from the National Cancer Institute's TREC Year-One evaluation study [J].
Hall, Kara L. ;
Stokols, Daniel ;
Moser, Richard P. ;
Taylor, Brandie K. ;
Thornquist, Mark D. ;
Nebeling, Linda C. ;
Ehret, Carolyn C. ;
Barnett, Matthew J. ;
McTiernan, Anne ;
Berger, Nathan A. ;
Goran, Michael I. ;
Jeffery, Robert W. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (02) :S161-S172
[13]  
HEITKEMPER M, 2008, NURS OUTLOOK, V115
[14]  
*IA STAT U RES MAN, 1 IOW STAT U RES MAN
[15]  
KULAGE KM, 2010, NATL COUNC U RES ADM, V42, P26
[16]   Minimizing disincentives for collaborative research [J].
Larson, EL .
NURSING OUTLOOK, 2003, 51 (06) :267-271
[17]   A Comprehensive Space Management Model for Facilitating Programmatic Research [J].
Libecap, Ann ;
Wormsley, Steven ;
Cress, Anne ;
Matthews, Mary ;
Souza, Angie ;
Joiner, Keith A. .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2008, 83 (03) :207-216
[18]  
*MERC U GRANT CONT, MERC U FAC ADM F A C
[19]  
*NAT COUNC U RES A, LISTS RUL
[20]  
*NIH OFF DIR OFF E, REQ INF PLAN REC MUL