Positive surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy - An analysis of outcomes from a UK tertiary referral centre

被引:33
作者
Sachdeva, Ashwin [1 ,2 ]
Veeratterapillay, Rajan [1 ]
Voysey, Antonia [1 ]
Kelly, Katherine [1 ]
Johnson, Mark I. [1 ]
Aning, Jonathan [1 ]
Soomro, Naeem A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Tyne Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Freeman Hosp, Dept Urol, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Newcastle Univ, Northern Inst Canc Res, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
来源
BMC UROLOGY | 2017年 / 17卷
关键词
ADJUVANT RADIOTHERAPY; ONCOLOGICAL OUTCOMES; CANCER; ANTIGEN; IMPACT; RATES; METAANALYSIS; PATTERNS; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1186/s12894-017-0262-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Positive surgical margins are a strong prognostic marker of disease outcome following radical prostatectomy, though prior evidence is largely from a PSA-screened population. We therefore aim to evaluate the biochemical recurrence in men with positive surgical margins (PSM) after minimally-invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) in a UK tertiary centre. Methods: Retrospective study of men undergoing laparoscopic or robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy between 2002 and 2014. Men with positive surgical margins (PSM) were identified and their biochemical recurrence (BCR) rate compared with men without PSM. The primary outcome measures were BCR rates and time to BCR. Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios for biochemical recurrence rate (BCR), accounting for potential confounders. Results: Five hundred ninety-two men were included for analysis. Pre-operative D'Amico risk stratification showed 37.5%, 53.3% and 9.3% of patients in the low, intermediate and high-risk groups, respectively. On final pathological analysis, the proportion of patients with local staging pT2, pT3a and pT3b was 68.8%, 25.2% and 6.1% respectively. Overall positive margin rate was 30.6%. On multivariate analysis, the only pre-operative factor associated with PSM was age > 65years. Patients with PSM were more likely to have higher tumour volume and more advanced pathological local stage. The BCR rate was 10.7% in margin-positive patients and 5.1% in margin-negative patients, at median 4.4-year follow-up. Upon multivariate analysis, high pre-operative PSA and high Gleason group were the only significant predictors of BCR (P< 0.05). Conclusions: In comparison to patients with negative surgical margins, those with PSM do not translate into worse medium-term oncological outcomes in the majority of cases amongst our cohort. We found that high preoperative PSA and high Gleason group were the only significant predictors of BCR.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Abdollah F, 2016, WORLD J UROL
  • [2] Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911)
    Bolla, Michel
    van Poppel, Hein
    Tombal, Bertrand
    Vekemans, Kris
    Da Pozzo, Luigi
    de Reijke, Theo M.
    Verbaeys, Antony
    Bosset, Jean-Francois
    van Velthoven, Roland
    Colombel, Marc
    van de Beek, Cees
    Verhagen, Paul
    van den Bergh, Alphonsus
    Sternberg, Cora
    Gasser, Thomas
    van Tienhoven, Geertjan
    Scalliet, Pierre
    Haustermans, Karin
    Collette, Laurence
    [J]. LANCET, 2012, 380 (9858) : 2018 - 2027
  • [3] The Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality Following Radical Prostatectomy During the Prostate Specific Antigen Era
    Boorjian, Stephen A.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Crispen, Paul L.
    Carlson, Rachel E.
    Rangel, Laureano J.
    Bergstralh, Eric J.
    Blute, Michael L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (03) : 1003 - 1009
  • [4] Impact of surgical margin status on prostate-cancer-specific mortality
    Chalfin, Heather J.
    Dinizo, Michael
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Feng, Zhaoyong
    Partin, Alan W.
    Walsh, Patrick C.
    Humphreys, Elizabeth
    Han, Misop
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11) : 1684 - 1689
  • [5] EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part II: Treatment of Relapsing, Metastatic, and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
    Cornford, Philip
    Bellmunt, Joaquim
    Bolla, Michel
    Briers, Erik
    De Santis, Maria
    Gross, Tobias
    Henry, Ann M.
    Joniau, Steven
    Lam, Thomas B.
    Mason, Malcolm D.
    van der Poel, Henk G.
    van der Kwast, Theo H.
    Rouviere, Olivier
    Wiegel, Thomas
    Mottet, Nicolas
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (04) : 630 - 642
  • [6] Dev HS, 2015, UROL ONCOL, V33, p[109, e7]
  • [7] Positive surgical margins: rate, contributing factors and impact on further treatment: findings from the Prostate Cancer Registry
    Evans, Sue M.
    Millar, Jeremy L.
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Davis, Ian D.
    Spelman, Tim
    Bolton, Damien M.
    Giles, Graham G.
    Dean, Joanne
    Costello, Anthony J.
    Frauman, Albert G.
    Kearns, Paul A.
    Day, Laura
    Daniels, Christopher
    McNeill, John J.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 (05) : 680 - 690
  • [8] Predictors of Positive Surgical Margins After Laparoscopic Robot Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Novara, Giacomo
    Secco, Silvia
    D'Elia, Carolina
    Boscolo-Berto, Rafael
    Gardiman, Marina
    Cavalleri, Stefano
    Artibani, Walter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 182 (06) : 2682 - 2688
  • [9] Evolution and oncological outcomes of a contemporary radical prostatectomy practice in a UK regional tertiary referral centre
    Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
    Thurtle, David
    Srinivasan, Anandagopal
    Volanis, Dimitrios
    George, Anne
    Lophatananon, Artitaya
    Stearn, Sara
    Warren, Anne Y.
    Lamb, Alastair D.
    Shaw, Greg
    Sharma, Naomi
    Thomas, Ben C.
    Tran, Maxine G.
    Neal, David E.
    Shah, Nimish C.
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 118 (05) : 779 - 784
  • [10] Prostate Cancer Incidence and PSA Testing Patterns in Relation to USPSTF Screening Recommendations
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Fedewa, Stacey A.
    Ma, Jiemin
    Siegel, Rebecca
    Lin, Chun Chieh
    Brawley, Otis
    Ward, Elizabeth M.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 314 (19): : 2054 - 2061