Vibration exposure and biodynamic responses during whole-body vibration training

被引:226
作者
Abercromby, Andrew F. J.
Amonette, William E.
Layne, Charles S.
McFarlin, Brian K.
Hinman, Martha R.
Paloski, William H.
机构
[1] Wyle Labs Inc, Houston, TX 77058 USA
[2] Univ Houston Clear Lake, Human Performance Lab, Houston, TX 77058 USA
[3] Univ Houston, Lab Integrated Physiol, Houston, TX USA
[4] Hardin Simmons Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Abilene, TX 79601 USA
[5] NASA, Human Adapt & Countermeasures Div, Houston, TX USA
关键词
ISO; 2631-1; estimated vibration dose value; mechanical impedance; head acceleration; risk;
D O I
10.1249/mss.0b013e3181238a0f
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Purpose: Excessive, chronic whole-body vibration (WBV) has a number of negative side effects on the human body, including disorders of the skeletal, digestive, reproductive, visual, and vestibular systems. Whole-body vibration training (WBVT) is intentional exposure to WBV to increase leg muscle strength, bone mineral density, health-related quality of life, and decrease back pain. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively evaluate vibration exposure and biodynamic responses during typical WBVT regimens. Methods: Healthy men and women (N = 16) were recruited to perform slow, unloaded squats during WBVT (30 Hz; 4 mm(p-p)), during which knee flexion angle (KA), mechanical impedance, head acceleration (Ha(rms)), and estimated vibration dose value (eVDV) were measured. WBVT was repeated using two forms of vibration: I) vertical forces to both feet simultaneously (VV), and 2) upward forces to only one foot at a time (RV). Results: Mechanical impedance varied inversely with KA during RV (effect size, eta(2)(p) : 0.668, P < 0.01) and VV (eta(2)(p): 0.533, P < 0.05). Ha(rms) varied with KA (eta(2)(p): 0.686, P < 0.01) and is greater during VV than during RV at all KA (P < 0.01). The effect of KA on Ha(rms) is different for RV and VV (eta(2)(p): 0.567, P < 0.05). The eVDV associated with typical RV and VV training regimens (30 Hz, 4 mm(p-p) 10 min.d(-1)) exceeds the recommended daily vibration exposure as defined by ISO 2631-1 (P < 0.01). Conclusions: ISO standards indicate that 10 min.d(-1) WBVT is potentially harmful to the human body; the risk of adverse health effects may be lower during RV than VV and at half-squats rather than full-squats or upright stance. More research is needed to explore the long-term health hazards of WBVT.
引用
收藏
页码:1794 / 1800
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ABERCROMBY AFJ, 2006, THESIS U HOUSTON
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, MECH VIBRATION SHOCK
[3]   Experimental vibratory damage of the inner ear [J].
Bochnia, M ;
Morgenroth, K ;
Dziewiszek, W ;
Kassner, J .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2005, 262 (04) :307-313
[4]   PSYCHOPHYSICAL BASES OF PERCEIVED EXERTION [J].
BORG, GAV .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1982, 14 (05) :377-381
[5]  
BOVENZI M, 2005, ITAL MED LAV ERGON, V27, P58
[6]   Controlled whole body vibration to decrease fall risk and improve health-related quality of life of nursing home residents [J].
Bruyere, O ;
Wuidart, MA ;
Di Palma, E ;
Gourlay, M ;
Ethgen, O ;
Richy, F ;
Reginster, JY .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (02) :303-307
[7]  
Cardinale M., 2003, Acta Physiologica Hungarica, V90, P195, DOI 10.1556/APhysiol.90.2003.3.2
[8]  
Cardinale Marco, 2006, J Br Menopause Soc, V12, P12, DOI 10.1258/136218006775997261
[9]  
DRAEGER J, 1975, KLIN MONATSBL AUGENH, V166, P431
[10]  
Griffin M., 1996, HDB HUMAN VIBRATION