25 Years of Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management: Why Some Intergovernmental C&I Processes Flourished While Others Faded

被引:26
作者
Linser, Stefanie [1 ,2 ]
Wolfslehner, Bernhard [1 ,2 ]
Asmar, Fady [3 ]
Bridge, Simon R. J. [4 ]
Gritten, David [5 ]
Guadalupe, Vicente [6 ]
Jafari, Mostafa [7 ]
Johnson, Steven [8 ]
Laclau, Pablo [9 ]
Robertson, Guy [10 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Nat Resources & Life Sci, European Forest Inst, Vienna Reg Off, A-1180 Vienna, Austria
[3] NENA Reg, Baabda 40010, Lebanon
[4] Nat Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Serv, Ottawa, ON K1A 0E4, Canada
[5] Ctr People & Forests, Kasetsart PO, Bangkok 10903, Thailand
[6] Permanent Secretariat Amazon Cooperat Treaty Org, BR-71615160 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
[7] Tehran Proc Secretariat Low Forest Cover Countrie, Tehran 1311114968, Iran
[8] Int Trop Timber Org, Int Org Ctr, Yokohama, Kanagawa 2200012, Japan
[9] Natl Inst Agr Technol, RA-8370 San Martin, Argentina
[10] US Forest Serv, Res & Dev, Washington, DC 20250 USA
关键词
indicators; criteria; sustainable forest management; sustainable forestry; C&I for SFM processes; regional C&I processes; international C&I processes; intergovernmental C&I process; LOCAL-LEVEL CRITERIA; PROGRESS;
D O I
10.3390/f9090515
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The use of criteria and indicators (C&I) for data collection, monitoring, assessing and reporting on sustainable forest management (SFM) has been growing since the Earth Summit in 1992, supported by eleven intergovernmental, regional and international forest-related C&I processes. The initial effort led to varying levels of implementation across countries. Several processes never went much beyond the adoption of a first set of C&I while others have made substantial progress. In recent years, interest in C&I for SFM has again increased. In light of the Sustainable Development Goals and emerging global challenges the contribution of C&I to monitor, assess and report on forest conditions and trends is increasingly important. We compare and analyse the structure, activities and progress of the intergovernmental C&I processes. The work is based on document analysis and questionnaires sent to the secretariats of the processes and C&I experts. We found many similarities but also major differences in the structure and content of the C&I sets. The results provide a context for discussing and understanding why some of the C&I processes are successful in their work while others have stalled. Finally, we propose the required ingredients for success for the future activities of the forest-related intergovernmental C&I processes.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Local level criteria and indicator frameworks: A tool used to assess aboriginal forest ecosystem values [J].
Adam, M. C. ;
Kneeshaw, D. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 255 (07) :2024-2037
[2]  
[Anonymous], ANN SILVICULTURAL RE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Non-legally Binding Authoritative Statement of Principles for a Global Consensus on the Management, Conservation and Sustainable Development of all Types of Forests
[4]  
[Anonymous], ADV RES SUSTAINABLE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, ARES6298 UN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015 - Country Report
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, STAT TROP FOR MAN 20
[8]   Assessing the sustainability of forest management: An application of multi-criteria decision analysis to community forests in northern Ethiopia [J].
Balana, Bedru Babulo ;
Mathijs, Erik ;
Muys, Bart .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2010, 91 (06) :1294-1304
[9]  
Baycheva T., 2013, IMPLEMENTING CRITERI
[10]   Evaluating the implementation of the Pan-European Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management - A SWOT analysis [J].
Baycheva-Merger, Tanya ;
Wolfslehner, Bernhard .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 60 :1192-1199