Population-level trends and outcomes of sentinel lymph node biopsy in vulvar cancer surgery in the United States

被引:7
作者
Brunette, Laurie L. [1 ]
Khetan, Varun U. [1 ]
Deshpande, Rasika R. [1 ]
Nusbaum, David J. [2 ]
Klar, Maximilian [3 ]
Roman, Lynda D. [1 ,4 ]
Wright, Jason D. [5 ]
Matsuo, Koji [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, 2020 Zonal Ave,IRD 520, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Sect Urol, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Freiburg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Fac Med, Freiburg, Germany
[4] Univ Southern Calif, Norris Comprehens Canc Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
[5] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, New York, NY 10032 USA
关键词
Vulvar cancer; Sentinel lymph node biopsy; Trend; Characteristics; Outcome; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2022.01.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To examine population-level trends, characteristics, and outcomes related to nodal assessment for vulvar cancer surgery in the United States. Methods. This is a retrospective cohort study querying the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. The study population was 5604 women with T1 b or T2-smaller(<= 4 an) squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva who underwent primary vulvectomy from 2003 to 2018. The exposure allocation was based on nodal evaluation type: lymphadenectomy (LND; n = 3319, 59.2%), sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy Or 751, 13.4%), or no surgical nodal evaluation (n = 1534, 27.4%). The main outcomes were (i) trends and characteristics related to SLN biopsy assessed by multinomial regression model, and (ii) vulvar cancer-specific survival assessed by competing risk analysis and inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score. Sensitivity analysis included evaluation of external cohort with T1a disease (n = 1291). Results. The utilization of SLN biopsy increased from 5.7% to 23.3% in 2006-2018, while the proportion of LND decreased from 64.1% to 48.8% in 2010-2018, and these associations remained independent in multivariable analysis (adjusted-P < 0.05). In the propensity score weighted model, 5-year cumulative rate for vulvar cancer-specific mortality was 152% (interquartile range 12.1-18.9) for the SLN biopsy group and 16.9% (interquartile range 15.6-18.3) for the LND group (subdistribution-hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.76-1.06, P = 0217). The increasing SLN biopsy use was also observed in T1a disease from 1.3% to 7.3% during the study period (P < 0.001). Conclusion. The landscape of surgical nodal evaluation is shifting from lymphadenectomy to SLN biopsy in vulvar cancer surgery in the United States. SIN biopsy-incorporated treatment approach was not associated with worse survival compared to LND. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:651 / 657
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], National Cancer Institute Surveillance, epidemiology and end results
[2]   Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Lee, Douglas S. ;
Fine, Jason P. .
CIRCULATION, 2016, 133 (06) :601-609
[3]   Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Stuart, Elizabeth A. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (28) :3661-3679
[4]   Sentinel-node biopsy in melanoma [J].
Balch, Charles M. ;
Cascinelli, Natale .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (13) :1370-1371
[5]   THE IMPORTANCE OF THE GROIN NODE STATUS FOR THE SURVIVAL OF T1 AND T2 VULVAR CARCINOMA PATIENTS [J].
BURGER, MPM ;
HOLLEMA, H ;
EMANUELS, AG ;
KRANS, M ;
PRAS, E ;
BOUMA, J .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1995, 57 (03) :327-334
[6]   GOG 244-The lymphedema and gynecologic cancer (LEG) study: Incidence and risk factors in newly diagnosed patients [J].
Carlson, Jay W. ;
Kauderer, James ;
Hutson, Alan ;
Carter, Jeanne ;
Armer, Jane ;
Lockwood, Suzy ;
Nolte, Susan ;
Stewart, Bob R. ;
Wenzel, Lari ;
Walker, Joan ;
Fleury, Aimee ;
Bonebrake, Albert ;
Soper, John ;
Mathews, Cara ;
Zivanovic, Oliver ;
Richards, Wm Edward ;
Tan, Annie ;
Alberts, David S. ;
Barakat, Richard R. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 156 (02) :467-474
[7]  
Cohen J., 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
[8]   ALTERNATE APPROACH TO EARLY CANCER OF THE VULVA [J].
DISAIA, PJ ;
CREASMAN, WT ;
RICH, WM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1979, 133 (07) :825-832
[9]   STROBE Reporting Guidelines for Observational Studies [J].
Ghaferi, Amir A. ;
Schwartz, Todd A. ;
Pawlik, Timothy M. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2021, 156 (06) :577-578
[10]   Outcome modelling strategies in epidemiology: traditional methods and basic alternatives [J].
Greenland, Sander ;
Daniel, Rhian ;
Pearce, Neil .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 45 (02) :565-575