Changing trends in the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in type 1 diabetes mellitus from 1990 to 2018: A retrospective study in a Portuguese population

被引:5
作者
Madeira, Carolina [1 ]
Lopes, Miguel [3 ]
Laiginhas, Rita [2 ]
Neves, Joao [3 ,4 ]
Rosas, Vitor [1 ]
Barbosa, Margarida [5 ]
Carvalho, Davide [3 ,4 ]
Falcao-Reis, Fernando [1 ,6 ]
Falcao, Manuel [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp & Univ Sao Joao, Dept Ophthalmol, Porto, Portugal
[2] Ctr Hosp Entre Douro & Vouga, Dept Ophthalmol, Santa Maria Feira, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Porto, Portugal
[4] Ctr Hosp & Univ Sao Joao Porto, Dept Endocrinol Diabet & Metab, Porto, Portugal
[5] Ctr Hosp & Univ Sao Joao, Dept Anesthesiol, Porto, Portugal
[6] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Dept Surg & Physiol, Porto, Portugal
关键词
Diabetic retinopathy; Proliferative diabetic retinopathy; Type 1 diabetes mellitus and population-based study; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; RISK-FACTORS; PROGRESSION; COMPLICATIONS; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107891
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy /(DR) in a Portuguese population with type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Methods: Retrospective review of all patients with T1DM, whose reference center was Centro Hospitalar de Sao Joao, a tertiary center in Portugal, who were diagnosed between 1990 and 2018. DR was classified based on fundus examination in medical records as (0) no evidence of retinopathy, (1) mild non-proliferative retinopathy (NPDR); (2) moderate to severe non-proliferative retinopathy (NPDR) and (3) proliferative retinopathy (PDR). Patients were classified according to the eye with a worse retinopathy stage. Follow-up was considered as time between the diagnosis of diabetes and the last funduscopic evaluation. Results: 233 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The prevalence of any DR at less than 5, 10, 15, 20 and more than 20-years of DM was 1.8%, 10.4%, 34.8%, 54.1% and 71.2% respectively. The overall prevalence of DR was 43.3% (n = 101). At the last observation, 43 patients (18.5%) had mild NPDR, 34 patients (14.6%) had moderate to severe NPDR and 24 patients (10.3%) had PDR. The longer the disease duration, the higher the number of patients with DR. Conclusion: The prevalence of DR in our cohort was 34.8% after 15 years of systemic disease and 54.1% after 20 years, which is lower than what has been reported in the literature. Further multicentric prospective studies, are needed to clarify changes in the epidemiology of DR in type 1 diabetics. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, DIABETES CARE, V41, pS1, DOI [10.2337/dc18-Sint01, 10.2337/dc18-SINT01]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, DIABETES, V44, P968
[3]  
[Anonymous], DIAB CARE
[4]  
[Anonymous], NORMA DIRECAO GERAL
[5]  
[Anonymous], EUR SOC CARDIOL ESC
[6]   Important causes of visual impairment in the world today [J].
Congdon, NG ;
Friedman, DS ;
Lietman, T .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (15) :2057-2060
[7]   Incidence of Blindness and Severe Visual Impairment in Germany: Projections for 2030 [J].
Finger, Robert P. ;
Fimmers, Rolf ;
Holz, Frank G. ;
Scholl, Hendrik P. N. .
INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2011, 52 (07) :4381-4389
[8]   Diabetic retinopathy in type 1 diabetes patients in Western Norway [J].
Jansson, Ragnhild W. ;
Hufthammer, Karl Ove ;
Krohn, Jorgen .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2018, 96 (05) :465-474
[9]  
Jorge Z, 2003, Acta Med Port, V16, P251
[10]   Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Norway: report from a screening study [J].
Kilstad, Hilde Nygaard ;
Sjolie, Anne Katrine ;
Goransson, Lasse ;
Hapnes, Rune ;
Henschien, Hans Jorgen ;
Alsbirk, Knud Erik ;
Fossen, Kristian ;
Bertelsen, Geir ;
Holstad, Gro ;
Bergrem, Harald .
ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2012, 90 (07) :609-612