Vein diameter is a predictive factor for recanalization in treatment with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy

被引:15
作者
Toniolo, Jason [1 ]
Chiang, Nathaniel [1 ]
Munteanu, Diana [2 ]
Russell, Amelia [2 ]
Hao, Huming [1 ]
Chuen, Jason [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Austin Hlth, Dept Vasc Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
UGFS; Sclerotherapy; Varicose veins; Vein diameter;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.05.029
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) is a low-cost and minimally invasive treatment option for varicose veins. There is a relative paucity of outcome reports. Methods: UGFS procedures at a tertiary public hospital between 2010 and 2017 were studied. Either the great saphenous vein (GSV) or small saphenous vein (SSV) was treated. Pretreatment, in-treatment, 6-week, and 1-year post-treatment ultrasound reports were analyzed. The primary outcome was to determine whether vein diameter predicts obliteration failure. Results: There were 457 treatments completed in 290 patients. The GSV was targeted in 372 (81%). Mean vein diameters of the GSV were not different from those of the SSV (GSV, 5.7 mm; SSV, 6.2 mm; P = .18); 109 (24%) had a Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology score of at least 4. Of the 457 UGFS procedures, 360 (78.8%) were for primary veins. Baseline information, including vein diameter, was not different between primary and recurrent veins. At 6 weeks, complete obliteration, partial recanalization, and complete recanalization rates were 54.9%, 29.1%, and 16%, respectively. Of those with complete obliteration at 6 weeks, the recanalization rate at 1 year was 25%. Increasing vein diameter was associated with recanalization at 1 year (obliteration, 4.9 mm; recanalization, 5.7 mm; P = .03), especially for primary veins (4.8 vs 5.8 mm; P = .009). Multivariate analysis showed similar outcome. Vein diameter of >6 mm had good specificity (88%) but poor sensitivity (43%) for predicting obliteration failure. There were 15 (3%) new-onset deep venous thromboses reported on follow-up, all of which were from treatment of primary veins (P = .049). Conclusions: Only 44% of UGFS procedures were observed to have complete obliteration at 1 year after a single intervention. Significant recanalization developed at 1 year. Increased vein diameter was associated with recanalization. The impact on clinical recurrence is unknown.
引用
收藏
页码:707 / 716
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Microfoam ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy treatment for varicose veins in a subgroup with diameters at the junction of 10 mm or greater compared with a subgroup of less than 10 mm
    Barrett, JM
    Allen, B
    Ockelford, A
    Goldman, MP
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2004, 30 (11) : 1386 - 1390
  • [2] Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins
    Biemans, Anke A. M.
    Kockaert, Michael
    Akkersdijk, George P.
    van den Bos, Renate R.
    de Maeseneer, Marianne G. R.
    Cuypers, Philip
    Stijnen, Theo
    Neumann, Martino H. A.
    Nijsten, Tamar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 58 (03) : 727 - +
  • [3] Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy is a safe and clinically effective treatment for superficial venous reflux
    Bradbury, Andrew W.
    Bate, Gareth
    Pang, Karl
    Darvall, Katy A.
    Adam, Donald J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 52 (04) : 939 - 945
  • [4] Prospective five-year study of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux
    Chapman-Smith, P.
    Browne, A.
    [J]. PHLEBOLOGY, 2009, 24 (04) : 183 - 188
  • [5] Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy for Treating Incompetent Great Saphenous Veins-Results of 5 Years of Analysis and Morphologic Evolvement Study
    Chen, Chien-Hsun
    Chiu, Cheng-Sheng
    Yang, Chih-Hsun
    [J]. DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2012, 38 (06) : 851 - 857
  • [6] Duplex Ultrasound Outcomes Following Ultrasound-Guided Foam Sclerotherapy of Symptomatic Primary Great Saphenous Varicose Veins
    Darvall, K. A. L.
    Bate, G. R.
    Adam, D. J.
    Silverman, S. H.
    Bradbury, A. W.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 40 (04) : 534 - 539
  • [7] A review of randomised controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy with endothermal ablation for the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins
    Davies, Huw O. B.
    Popplewell, Matthew
    Darvall, Katy
    Bate, Gareth
    Bradbury, Andrew W.
    [J]. PHLEBOLOGY, 2016, 31 (04) : 234 - 240
  • [8] Endovenous laser ablation with and without high ligation compared with high ligation and stripping in the treatment of great saphenous varicose veins: initial results of a multicentre randomized controlled trial
    Flessenkaemper, I.
    Hartmann, M.
    Stenger, D.
    Roll, S.
    [J]. PHLEBOLOGY, 2013, 28 (01) : 16 - 23
  • [9] Gloviczki P, 2012, PHLEBOLOGY, V27, P2, DOI [10.1258/phleb.2012.012s28, 10.1258/phleb.2012.012S28]
  • [10] The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: Clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum
    Gloviczki, Peter
    Comerota, Anthony J.
    Dalsing, Michael C.
    Eklof, Bo G.
    Gillespie, David L.
    Gloviczki, Monika L.
    Lohr, Joann M.
    McLafferty, Robert B.
    Meissner, Mark H.
    Murad, M. Hassan
    Padberg, Frank T.
    Pappas, Peter J.
    Passman, Marc A.
    Raffetto, Joseph D.
    Vasquez, Michael A.
    Wakefield, Thomas W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 53 : 2S - 48S