The Appeal to Expert Opinion: Quantitative Support for a Bayesian Network Approach

被引:60
作者
Harris, Adam J. L. [1 ]
Hahn, Ulrike [2 ]
Madsen, Jens K. [2 ]
Hsu, Anne S. [3 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Expt Psychol, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, England
[2] Birkbeck Coll, Dept Psychol Sci, London, England
[3] Queen Mary Univ, Sch Elect Engn & Comp Sci, London, England
关键词
Argumentation; Appeal to authority; Appeal to expert opinion; Epistemic authority; Bayesian probability; Quantitative modeling; SOURCE CREDIBILITY; TRUST; ARGUMENTATION; WITNESS; TRUSTWORTHINESS; PERSUASIVENESS; RATIONALITY; JUDGMENT; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/cogs.12276
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The appeal to expert opinion is an argument form that uses the verdict of an expert to support a position or hypothesis. A previous scheme-based treatment of the argument form is formalized within a Bayesian network that is able to capture the critical aspects of the argument form, including the central considerations of the expert's expertise and trustworthiness. We propose this as an appropriate normative framework for the argument form, enabling the development and testing of quantitative predictions as to how people evaluate this argument, suggesting that such an approach might be beneficial to argumentation research generally. We subsequently present two experiments as an example of the potential for future research in this vein, demonstrating that participants' quantitative ratings of the convincingness of a proposition that has been supported with an appeal to expert opinion were broadly consistent with the predictions of the Bayesian model.
引用
收藏
页码:1496 / 1533
页数:38
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
Anderson J. R, 1990, ADAPTIVE CHARACTER H
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1977, Methodological Pragmatism
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, ATTITUDES PERSUASION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, DIFFERENCE POWER DIV
[6]   A survey of trust in computer science and the Semantic Web [J].
Artz, Donovan ;
Gil, Yolanda .
JOURNAL OF WEB SEMANTICS, 2007, 5 (02) :58-71
[7]  
Balakrishnan R., 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on World Wide Web, P227
[8]   SOURCE CREDIBILITY IN SOCIAL JUDGMENT - BIAS, EXPERTISE, AND THE JUDGES POINT OF VIEW [J].
BIRNBAUM, MH ;
STEGNER, SE .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 37 (01) :48-74
[9]  
Bovens L., 2003, Bayesian epistemology
[10]  
Braunsberger K., 1998, J SERV MARK, V12, P23, DOI DOI 10.1108/08876049810202348/FULL