Firm-level digital transformation affects individual-level innovative behavior: Evidence from manufacturing firms in China

被引：1
作者：
Zhao, Xiaomin [1 ]
Liu, Yunqing [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Yu [3 ]
Fan, Jianchang [4 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Finance & Publ Management, 962 Caoshan Rd, Bengbu 233030, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Technol & Business Univ, Sch Management, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[4] Nanjing Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Mkt & Logist Management, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源：
SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY | 2021年 / 49卷 / 11期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
digital transformation; digital technology; minority dissent; innovative behavior; individual innovation; manufacturing firms; TASK CONFLICT; DECISION-MAKING; DISSENT; ORGANIZATIONS; EMPOWERMENT; PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENT; COMMITMENT; GENERATION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I：
10.2224/sbp.10840
中图分类号：
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号：
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要：
Digital technologies significantly impact on manufacturing firms as they innovate their business processes in response to rapidly changing environments. Therefore, the proper use of digital technology to promote innovative behavior has become an important topic in research. However, few studies have examined how firm-level digital transformation affects individual-level innovative behavior. Drawing on the minority dissent perspective, we explored the mechanism by which digital transformation affects innovative behavior. Surveying 540 participants from Chinese manufacturing firms revealed that firm-level digital transformation was significantly correlated with both cross-functional minority dissent and individual-level innovative behavior. Moreover, minority dissent played a partial mediating role in the relationship between digital transformation and innovative behavior. This study sheds new light on how firm-level digital transformation can determine individual-level innovative behavior.
引用
收藏
页数：12
相关论文
共 51 条
[11]   The Paradox of Intragroup Conflict: A Meta-Analysis [J].
de Wit, Frank R. C. ;
Greer, Lindred L. ;
Jehn, Karen A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 97 (02) :360-390
[12]   Attaining decision quality and commitment from dissent: The moderating effects of loyalty and competence in strategic decision-making teams [J].
Dooley, RS ;
Fryxell, GE .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (04) :389-402
[13]  
Doroudi H., 2017, INNOVATION MANAGEMEN, V6, P45
[14]   Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When [J].
Farh, Jiing-Lih ;
Lee, Cynthia ;
Farh, Crystal I. C. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 95 (06) :1173-1180
[15]  
Fitzgerald M., 2013, MIT SLOAN MANAGEMENT
[16]   Cross-functionality and innovation in new product development teams: A dilemmatic structure and its consequences for the management of diversity [J].
Gebert, Diether ;
Boerner, Sabine ;
Kearney, Eric .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF WORK AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 15 (04) :431-458
[17]   Debating big data: A literature review on realizing value from big data [J].
Guenther, Wendy Arianne ;
Mehrizi, Mohammad H. Rezazade ;
Huysman, Marleen ;
Feldberg, Frans .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 26 (03) :191-209
[18]  
Hess T, 2016, MIS Q EXEC, V15, P123
[19]   Team-Level Predictors of Innovation at Work: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Spanning Three Decades of Research [J].
Hulsheger, Ute R. ;
Anderson, Neil ;
Salgado, Jesus F. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 94 (05) :1128-1145
[20]   VICTIMS OF GROUPTHINK - PSYCHOLOGICAL STUDY OF FOREIGN POLICY DECISIONS AND FIASCOES - JANIS,IL [J].
JONES, AM .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1973, 407 (MAY) :179-180
123456