The differential outcome effect as a useful tool to improve conditional discrimination learning in children

被引:62
作者
Estévez, AF [1 ]
Fuentes, LJ
Marí-Bêffa, P
González, C
Alvarez, D
机构
[1] Univ Almeria, Dpto Psicol Expt & Psicobiol, Almeria 04120, Spain
[2] Univ Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
关键词
differential outcome effect and children;
D O I
10.1006/lmot.2000.1060
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The differential outcome effect (DOE) refers to the increase in speed of acquisition and terminal accuracy that occurs in conditional discrimination learning when two or more stimuli are correlated with a particular outcome. Previous studies demonstrated the benefits of the DOE in preschool children. In two experiments we extended the DOE methodology to older children and tasks of different difficulty. Experiment 1 indicated that the DOE procedure improved conditional discrimination performance of 4- to 7-year-old children. However, this effect was not present in children aged 8 years. In Experiment 2, we increased the difficulty of the task and demonstrated that these children in the differential outcome condition performed significantly better on this complex version of the discriminative task than those in the matched control group. It is proposed that the DOE is a general effect that is not limited to early stages of development and that the difficulty of the task is an important variable to consider when a differential outcome procedure is used. (C) 2001 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 64
页数:17
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   2-CHOICE CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION PERFORMANCE OF PIGEONS AS A FUNCTION OF REWARD EXPECTANCY, PRE-CHOICE DELAY, AND DOMESTICITY [J].
BRODIGAN, DL ;
PETERSON, GB .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1976, 4 (02) :121-124
[2]   MEDIATORS OF EFFECTS OF MAGNITUDE OF REINFORCEMENT [J].
CARLSON, JG ;
WIELKIEWICZ, RM .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1976, 7 (02) :184-196
[3]   EFFECTS OF DIFFERENTIAL REINFORCEMENT EXPECTANCIES ON SUCCESSIVE MATCHING-TO-SAMPLE PERFORMANCE IN PIGEONS [J].
DELONG, RE ;
WASSERMAN, EA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES, 1981, 7 (04) :394-412
[4]   DELAYED MATCHING TO SAMPLE WITH OUTCOME-SPECIFIC CONTINGENCIES IN MENTALLY-RETARDED HUMANS [J].
DUBE, WV ;
ROCCO, FJ ;
MCILVANE, WJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 1989, 39 (04) :483-492
[5]   THE DIFFERENTIAL OUTCOMES EFFECT [J].
GOETERS, S ;
BLAKELY, E ;
POLING, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 1992, 42 (03) :389-411
[6]  
Joseph B, 1997, AM J MENT RETARD, V101, P374
[7]   ANTICIPATION OF REWARD OMISSION AS A CUE FOR CHOICE BEHAVIOR [J].
KRUSE, JM ;
OVERMIER, JB .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1982, 13 (04) :505-525
[8]  
MAKI P, 1995, PSYCHOL REC, V45, P45
[9]  
Malanga P., 1992, DEV DISABILITIES B, V20, P39
[10]  
OVERMIER JB, 1967, J COMP PHYSIOL PSYCH, V63, P23