Intraoperative local injection of uterosacral ligaments with ropivacaine during uterine surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:1
|
作者
Abu-Zaid, Ahmed [1 ,2 ]
Alomar, Osama [2 ,3 ]
Abuzaid, Mohammed [4 ]
Magzoub, Duha [5 ]
Al-Badawi, Ismail A. [2 ,3 ]
Salem, Hany [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Ctr Hlth Sci, Coll Grad Hlth Sci, Memphis, TN 38163 USA
[2] Alfaisal Univ, Coll Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Fahad Med City, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] Univ Memphis, Sch Publ Hlth, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
关键词
Hysterectomy; Myomectomy; Opioids; Postoperative pain; Ropivacaine; Uterosacral ligaments; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; DOUBLE-BLIND; ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY; INFILTRATION ANALGESIA; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; RELIEF; INSTILLATION; ANESTHETICS; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102077
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Aim: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that examined the efficacy of intraoperative local injection of the uterosacral ligaments with ropivacaine on postoperative pain and opioids consumption in patients undergoing uterine surgery for hysterectomy/myomectomy. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were screened from inception to September 5th, 2020. We appraised the risk of bias using the Cochrane's risk of bias tool. Resting postoperative pain scores and cumulative consumption of postoperative opioids were regarded as continuous data, analyzed using the inverse variance method and reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) and weighted mean difference (MD), respectively, with 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CIs). Results: Five studies met the inclusion criteria comprising 230 patients (117 and 113 patients received ropivacaine and placebo, respectively). The studies had an overall low risk of bias. Resting postoperative pain scores were not significantly different between both groups at 2 h (SMD = -0.30, 95 % CI [-0.70, 0.11], p = 0.15), 12 h (SMD = 0.04, 95 % CI [-0.26, 0.37], p = 0.81) and 24 h (SMD = -0.06, 95 % CI [-0.32, 0.20], p = 0.68). However, the ropivacaine group had significantly reduced cumulative opioid consumption during the first 24 h postoperatively (MD = -9.07, 95 % CI [-14.47, -3.66], p = 0.001). Conclusion: Intraoperative local infiltration of uterosacral ligaments with ropivacaine is technically feasible and significantly reduces postoperative opioid consumption in women undergoing gynecologic surgery of the uterus. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prevention of Bleeding in Orthognathic Surgery-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Olsen, Jesper J.
    Skov, Jane
    Ingerslev, Janne
    Thorn, Jens J.
    Pinholt, Else M.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (01) : 139 - 150
  • [42] Adductor Canal Block or Local Infiltrate Analgesia for Pain Control After Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sardana, Vandit
    Burzynski, Joanna M.
    Scuderi, Giles R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (01) : 183 - 189
  • [43] Efficacy of Ropivacaine Administration on Post-tonsillectomy Pain in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-controlled Trials
    Albazee, Ebraheem
    Diab, Rehab Adel
    Soliman, Mostafa A.
    Abdelaziz, Ahmed
    Mouffokes, Adel
    Desouki, Sara
    Ibrahim, Rahma
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY AND HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2023, 75 (04) : 4223 - 4231
  • [44] Analgesic Efficacy of Intraoperative Superior Hypogastric Plexus (SHP) Block during Abdominal Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Controlled Trials
    Salem, Hany
    Bukhari, Ibtihal Abdulaziz
    Al Baalharith, Maha
    AlTahtam, Nasser
    Alabdrabalamir, Safa
    Jamjoom, Mohammed Ziad
    Baradwan, Saeed
    Badghish, Ehab
    Abuzaid, Mohammed
    AbuAlsaud, Fatimah Shakir
    Alomar, Osama
    Alyousef, Abdullah
    Abu-Zaid, Ahmed
    Al-Badawi, Ismail Abdulrahman
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2023, 59 (05):
  • [45] The impact of ketamine on pain-related outcomes after thoracotomy: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhaksylyk, Aruzhan
    Abdildin, Yerkin G.
    Sultangazin, Suienish
    Zhumakanova, Aigerim
    Viderman, Dmitriy
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11
  • [46] Comparison of Intercostal Block and Epidural Analgesia for Post-thoracotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhou, Zangong
    Zheng, Xin
    Song, Jianfang
    Jin, Xiangfeng
    Zhao, Lipeng
    Liu, Shanling
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2023, 26 (03) : 219 - 229
  • [47] Acupuncture for tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Huang, Kaiyu
    Liang, Shuang
    Chen, Lei
    Grellet, Antoine
    ACUPUNCTURE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 39 (04) : 264 - 271
  • [48] Corticosteroids for neurocysticercosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A.
    Roldan-Benitez, Yetiani M.
    Perez-Gaxiola, Giordano
    Villarreal-Careaga, Jorge
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 17 (08) : E583 - E592
  • [49] Efficacy and Safety of Postoperative Pain Relief by Parecoxib Injection after Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Huang, Jun-ming
    Lv, Zheng-tao
    Zhang, Ya-nan
    Jiang, Wen-xiu
    Li, Han-ning
    Nie, Ming-bo
    PAIN PRACTICE, 2018, 18 (05) : 597 - 610
  • [50] Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Appears to Be Effective and Safe as a Part of Multimodal Analgesia in Bariatric Surgery: a Meta-analysis and Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Foldi, Maria
    Soos, Alexandra
    Hegyi, Peter
    Kiss, Szabolcs
    Szakacs, Zsolt
    Solymar, Margit
    Petervari, Erika
    Balasko, Marta
    Kusza, Krzysztof
    Molnar, Zsolt
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2021, 31 (02) : 531 - 543