The Vaccination Process against the COVID-19: Opportunities, Problems and mHealth Support

被引:4
作者
Simeoni, Rossella [1 ]
Maccioni, Giovanni [2 ]
Giansanti, Daniele [2 ]
机构
[1] Catholic Univ, Fac Med & Surg, I-010130 Viterbo, Italy
[2] Ist Super Sanita ISS, Ctr Tisp, Via Regina Elena 299, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
COVID-19; SARS-CoV2; mHealth; mobile technology; digital divide; EQUITY; IMPACT; STRATEGIES; LITERACY; EHEALTH; ACCESS;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare9091165
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The vaccination against the COVID-19, finally available, has the potential to represent an important defence against the pandemic. The identification of both obstacles and tools to combat them are, at this moment, of strategic importance. Previous experiences on vaccinations have shown solutions and paths to take, also based on the behavioural sciences. The objective of the opinion is to face how mobile technology can help us both to fight these problems and to optimize the vaccination process. The opinion has four polarities. The first polarity consists in having detected the problems hampering an effective vaccination process. These problems have been grouped into the following four: Electronic and Informatic divide, Escape, Exposure risk, and Equity. The second polarity consists in having verified how the mobile technology can be useful to face the identified problems. The third polarity highlights the usefulness and importance of using electronic surveys. These tools are based on mobile technology. They are useful problem sensors for the stakeholders. The fourth polarity faces how mobile technology and mHealth can be of aid to optimize the flow of the vaccination process, from the first call up to the certification. This polarity is supported by an example based on the Italian national App IO. The study highlights: (a) on one side, the potential of mobile technology; on the other side, the need for interventions to reduce the digital divide with the purpose to increase its use. (b) How the role of mobile technology can be complementary to other intervention methods.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 59 条
[51]   Achieving path-dependent equity for global COVID-19 vaccine allocation [J].
So, Anthony D. ;
Woo, Joshua .
MED, 2021, 2 (04) :373-377
[52]  
Tarzian Anita J, 2021, Fed Pract, V38, P52, DOI 10.12788/fp.0093
[53]   Learning from past mistakes? The COVID-19 vaccine and the inverse equity hypothesis [J].
Todd, Adam ;
Bambra, Clare .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 31 (01) :2-2
[54]   What factors promote vaccine hesitancy or acceptance during pandemics? A systematic review and thematic analysis [J].
Truong, Judy ;
Bakshi, Simran ;
Wasim, Aghna ;
Ahmad, Mobeen ;
Majid, Umair .
HEALTH PROMOTION INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 37 (01)
[55]   The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access [J].
van Deursen, Alexander J. A. M. ;
van Dijk, Jan A. G. M. .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2019, 21 (02) :354-375
[56]   Collateral benefits of Internet use: Explaining the diverse outcomes of engaging with the Internet [J].
Van Deursen, Alexander J. A. M. ;
Helsper, Ellen J. .
NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2018, 20 (07) :2333-2351
[57]  
Vangala S., 2021, NATURE, DOI [10.1101/2021.04.12.21254876, DOI 10.1101/2021.04.12.21254876]
[58]   A qualitative study exploring the relationship between mothers' vaccine hesitancy and health beliefs with COVID-19 vaccination intention and prevention during the early pandemic months [J].
Walker, Kimberly K. ;
Head, Katharine J. ;
Owens, Heather ;
Zimet, Gregory D. .
HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2021, 17 (10) :3355-3364
[59]   A media intervention applying debunking versus non-debunking content to combat vaccine misinformation in elderly in the Netherlands: A digital randomised trial [J].
Yousuf, Hamza ;
van der Linden, Sander ;
Bredius, Luke ;
van Essen, G. A. ;
Sweep, Govert ;
Preminger, Zohar ;
van Gorp, Eric ;
Scherder, Erik ;
Narula, Jagat ;
Hofstra, Leonard .
ECLINICALMEDICINE, 2021, 35