Training Providers in Shared Decision Making for Trauma Treatment Planning

被引:7
作者
Etingen, Bella [1 ]
Hessinger, Jonathan D. [2 ]
Hunley, Holly A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Edward Hines Jr Vet Hlth Adm Hosp, Ctr Innovat Complex Chron Healthcare CINCCH, 5000 South 5th Ave 151H, Hines, IL 60141 USA
[2] Edward Hines Jr Vet Hlth Adm Hosp, Trauma Serv Program TSP, Mental Hlth Serv Line 116B, Hines, IL USA
关键词
posttraumatic stress disorder; shared decision making; patient preferences; mental health care; veterans; HEALTH-CARE; PATIENT; SATISFACTION; PERSPECTIVES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1037/ser0000511
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)/Department of Defense (DoD) Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) for the Management of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Acute Stress Disorder strives to advance the VA's practice of recovery-oriented, evidence-based, patient-centered care (PCC) for veterans with PTSD. A core foundation of PCC is that care is individually tailored to meet the needs and preferences of each patient. Accordingly, the 2017 update to the CPG specifically recommends the use of shared decision making (SDM), an individualized collaborative approach to treatment planning, in the PTSD treatment planning process. Although SDM has been promoted by the CPG throughout the VA and SDM training is being developed, no systemic training was available at the time the guidelines were updated. Additionally, while early research has studied the impact and experience of SDM for the patient, no work has explored provider experiences with SDM for those who work with trauma populations. This project bridges this gap by examining survey data collected 6 months following a formal SDM training to staff and trainees working with veterans who have experienced trauma within a trauma clinic at a large VA hospital. After the training, clinicians understood SDM and were engaging in SDM with their patients. Patients indicated that they were satisfied with and felt like an active participant in the treatment planning process. Clinician assumptions about the SDM process and barriers to SDM shown in previous research were also demonstrated. Implications for future research and practice, such as using decision aids in PTSD treatment planning and targeting clinician beliefs about SDM, are discussed. Impact Statement Recent PTSD clinical practice guidelines recommend engaging patients in SDM, however, research on SDM for PTSD treatment planning is lacking. We found that provider-facing SDM training promotes understanding and use of SDM among PTSD care team members, and patients are satisfied with the incorporation of SDM into PTSD treatment planning. Further development of provider-facing SDM training for PTSD care, such as the virtual training VA recently rolled, is warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 133
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] If You Build It, Will They Come? Designing Truly Patient-Centered Health Care
    Bechtel, Christine
    Ness, Debra L.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2010, 29 (05) : 914 - 920
  • [2] Trends and perspectives of shared decision-making in schizophrenia and related disorders
    Beitinger, Romain
    Kissling, Werner
    Hamann, Johannes
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 27 (03) : 222 - 229
  • [3] Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument
    Couet, Nicolas
    Desroches, Sophie
    Robitaille, Hubert
    Vaillancourt, Hugues
    Leblanc, Annie
    Turcotte, Stephane
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Legare, France
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (04) : 542 - 561
  • [4] Department of Defense, 2017, VA DOD CLIN PRACT GU
  • [5] The development of COMRADE - a patient-based outcome measure to evaluate the effectiveness of risk communication and treatment decision making in consultations
    Edwards, A
    Elwyn, G
    Hood, K
    Robling, M
    Atwell, C
    Holmes-Rovner, M
    Kinnersley, P
    Houston, H
    Russell, I
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (03) : 311 - 322
  • [6] Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Frosch, Dominick
    Thomson, Richard
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    Lloyd, Amy
    Kinnersley, Paul
    Cording, Emma
    Tomson, Dave
    Dodd, Carole
    Rollnick, Stephen
    Edwards, Adrian
    Barry, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (10) : 1361 - 1367
  • [7] Perceptions and observations of shared decision making during pediatric otolaryngology surgical consultations
    Evong, Yolanda
    Chorney, Jill
    Ungar, Gilanders
    Hong, Paul
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2019, 48 (1)
  • [8] Toward Optimal Decision Making among Vulnerable Patients Referred for Cardiac Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient and Provider Perspectives
    Gainer, Ryan A.
    Curran, Janet
    Buth, Karen J.
    David, Jennie G.
    Legare, Jean-Francois
    Hirsch, Gregory M.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2017, 37 (05) : 600 - 610
  • [9] Treatments Veterans Health Administration PTSD Specialty Program Providers Report Their Patients Prefer: The Role of Training and Theoretical Orientation
    Garcia, Hector A.
    DeBeer, Bryann R.
    Mignogna, Joseph
    Finley, Erin P.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA-THEORY RESEARCH PRACTICE AND POLICY, 2019, 11 (08) : 837 - 841
  • [10] Desired Involvement in Treatment Decisions Among Adults with PTSD Symptoms
    Harik, Juliette M.
    Hundt, Natalie E.
    Bernardy, Nancy C.
    Norman, Sonya B.
    Hamblen, Jessica L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2016, 29 (03) : 221 - 228